1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ELEN [110]
1 year ago
7

Is it technically cheating if you use these answers for yourself?

Law
2 answers:
vesna_86 [32]1 year ago
5 0

Question:

Is it technically cheating if you use these answers for yourself?

Answer:

The answer to your question would actually be yes, and no.

Explanation:

If you would state it word for word that would be cheating because your just copying someone else's work that would be called plagiarism, but if you only used it as a resource and changed it into your own words it wouldn't be considered cheating.

<em>I hope it helps you!</em>

~XxBells is a cute girlxX~

#Learn with Brainly

anygoal [31]1 year ago
4 0

if you copy like see it before thinking of it then yes

if not then no

You might be interested in
Which of the following are not negotiable instruments?
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

Che ques are not generally negotiable instruments in California. If you are talking about another state then the answer may vary.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose you walk into the Capitol in Washington and ask to interview the most prominent person in the entire Congress if they ac
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

either the president, the speaker of the house, or the president of the senate

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
The documented and unbroken transfer of evidence is a:
Volgvan

Answer:

Chain of Custody

Explanation:

Chain of Custody is the documented and unbroken transfer of evidence; lists all the people who came into contact with an item of evidence.

7 0
3 years ago
James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While
GalinKa [24]

Answer:

E. None of the above

Explanation:

Some employers think companies can only release dates of employment, salary and some other facts, but that is not the case. There are no federal laws restricting what an employer can or can´t say about former employees. Some states may have laws about what can legally disclose.  

So in this case Keller was fired so Radical Board can tell the Camp Manager what happened and that he was fired, and if he wants to he can also tell them about the suit against him.

8 0
3 years ago
Me pueden decir: 5 derechos y 5 deberes de los hijos a los padres
Over [174]

Answer:

5

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What year was the Federal Bureau of Prisons created?<br> O 1930<br> O 1915<br> O 1960<br> O 1820
    11·2 answers
  • In a burglary, pry or tool marks on a window may NOT act as ______. a. corpus delecti evidence
    7·2 answers
  • Does racial background affects someone’s ability to recognize someone of different race
    12·2 answers
  • Is the following statement true or false?
    7·2 answers
  • Why would intellectual property theft fit the mission of private technology security and possibly be more applicable than it is
    9·1 answer
  • A “judge advocate” is:
    15·2 answers
  • Why are you asked to rise when a jury walks into a cort room?
    9·1 answer
  • Highway engineers use natural laws of physics when designing a roadway.<br><br> true<br> false
    15·1 answer
  • Explain what the Corpus Iuris Civilis was and its importance for the development of law.
    5·1 answer
  • What are the advantages <br> and disadvantages of communism
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!