the answers is true true true true true
Answer:
The following clause states that "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each state to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other state"
a. The Full Faith and Credit Clause
Explanation:
- The option a is correct as the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution states that each state should give full faith and credit to the public acts, records and judicial proceedings of any other state in the United State of America.
- The option b is incorrect as The Privileges and Immunities Clause provides safeguard against the discrimination for the people of a state in other state.
- The option c is incorrect as this clause is about commerce matters so it is irrelevant here.
- The option d is incorrect as this clause is related to the agreement between the parties so it is also irrelevant here.
- The option e is also incorrect as the this bill is about the rights of the public and many more so it is also irrelevant in the given situation.
Answer:
lma o yes and in my defense they can be very intriguing ;). plus they were asking for it
Explanation:
Answer:
Numerous statistics indicate positive trends in the midstream and downstream oil markets, led by the domestic petroleum refining industry [1]. Domestic capacity has expanded, and there is a robust product-import market. Increased refining efficiencies have moderated crude-oil price rises since the 1970s. Products have been reformulated to improve environmental performance.
Higher refining margins in recent years have led to planned capacity additions, domestically and internationally. Few if any new refineries are likely to be built in the United States, however. This is because (among other factors) the financial disadvantage of building from scratch versus incrementally expanding existing capacity, the issue of permits aside. In all, the price- and profit-driven market process is ably at work, promising to bring the issue of pricing petroleum products back again to the issue of the globally-set price of crude oil.
In the case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank, regarding the <em><u>class action </u></em><em><u>lawsuit </u></em>settlement reached by the parties involved, we can confirm the settlement payment is that of 5.2 million dollars.
The case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank was a <u>class action </u><u>lawsuit</u>. A class-action suit is one in which the lawsuit is a collection of suits filed by <u>many parties, which are tried as a single case, and the parties in question are represented by </u><u>one member </u><u>or group of </u><u>members</u>.
In the case mentioned the lawsuit resulted in a settlement. This is when the party being sued <u>agrees to a payout in return for the charges being dropped. </u>It is said that the Bank in question created a settlement fund to pay the members involved, which held a total of 5.2 million dollars to be paid to the victims.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/16108643?referrer=searchResults
