1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Annette [7]
2 years ago
10

Maria is three years old and is just starting to learn that if she is in the grocery store and she doesn’t ask for a small candy

bar in the aisle, her mother will buy her an ice cream cone after shopping is over. She learned to wait for a larger reward instead of looking for the smaller rewards. What concept has maria learned?.
Social Studies
1 answer:
IRINA_888 [86]2 years ago
5 0

Maria, who is three years old, has taught to wait small candy bar for a bigger prize rather than pursuing lesser ones. Maria is aware of the idea of "<u>delaying pleasure.</u>"

<h3>Define the term Delaying gratification?</h3>
  • Delay of gratification is the act of fighting the urge to accept an immediate benefit in the hopes of receiving a future reward that will be more valuable.
  • The key to self-regulation, or self-control, is the capacity to postpone gratification.

For the given condition-

  • Maria, who is three years old, is just beginning to understand that her mother would buy her a ice cream cone when shopping is over if she doesn't ask for just a smaller candy bar with in aisle.
  • She discovered that waiting for a bigger prize was more wise than pursuing lesser ones.
  • Maria has learnt the value of postponing pleasure since she is aware that if she refuses to accept the store's smaller incentives of sweets, she would eventually be able to have the ice cream she really wants.

Thus,  Maria is aware of the idea of "delaying pleasure."

To know more about the Delaying gratification, here

brainly.com/question/24859619

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
If the federal government has a budget surplus in a given year, the national debt will:_______.a. decrease. b. remain constant.
Advocard [28]

Answer:

a. decrease.

Explanation:

If the federal government has a budget surplus in a given year, the national debt will decrease.

If a government has a budget surplus, it implies that the government after carrying out its financial obligations still has extra funds. These extra funds are mostly used by governments to pay off debts thus the national debt will increase. Countries like Belarus, South Korea experience budget surplus.

4 0
3 years ago
A simple random sample of 10 observations was taken from a large normal population. the sample mean and the population standard
8_murik_8 [283]
What we are looking for is the confidence interval.

Given:

Sample it is denoted by n = 10 

Mean = 80

Standard deviation = 12

Confidence Interval = 99%


Now compute for the margin of error, the formula is Za/2 * σ/√(n)


A 99% level of confidence has a critical value of zα/2 = 2.58.


The standard error is σ/√(n) = 3.162


Multiply 2.58 by 3.162 = 9.8 is the margin of error.


The formula for confidence interval is x̅ ± Za/2 * σ/√(n)

= 80 ± 9.8

= 70.2 < x< 89.8
7 0
3 years ago
If we were to design an experiment to test the hypothesis that aspirin takes headaches away, the independent variable would be _
nexus9112 [7]

Answer: C. aspirin; headaches

Explanation:

The variables in an experiment are either dependent or independent. An independent variable is the change that is introduced to test the hypothesis. A dependent variable on the other hand is the one being monitored or measured due to the introduction of other variables.

Here Headaches are the dependent variables as the experiment is to monitor whether the introduction of aspirin, the independent variable, takes headaches away.

8 0
4 years ago
In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, what was walter mischel’s side of the argument?.
Mazyrski [523]

In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.

<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>

In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.

<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>

Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.

Learn more about psychologists here:-

brainly.com/question/28321133

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Why did Queen Elizabeth not honor the Treaty of Tordsillas?
vladimir2022 [97]
In 1493, after reports of Columbus’s discoveries had reached them, the Spanish rulers Ferdinand and Isabella enlisted papal support for their claims to the New World in order to inhibit the Portuguese and other possible rival claimants. To accommodate them, the Spanish-born pope Alexander VI issued bulls setting up a line of demarcation from pole to pole 100 leagues (about 320 miles) west of the Cape Verde Islands. Spain was given exclusive rights to all newly discovered and undiscovered lands in the region west of the line. Portuguese expeditions were to keep to the east of the line. Neither power was to occupy any territory already in the hands of a Christian ruler.

No other European powers facing the Atlantic Ocean ever accepted this papal disposition or the subsequent agreement deriving from it. King John II of Portugal was dissatisfied because Portugal’s rights in the New World were insufficiently affirmed, and the Portuguese would not even have sufficient room at sea for their African voyages. Meeting at Tordesillas, in northwestern Spain, Spanish and Portuguese ambassadors reaffirmed the papal division, but the line itself was moved to 370 leagues (1,185 miles) west of the Cape Verde Islands, or about 46°30′ W of Greenwich. Pope Julius II finally sanctioned the change in 1506. The new boundary enabled Portugal to claim the coast of Brazil after its discovery by Pedro Álvares Cabral in 1500. Brazilian exploration and settlement far to the west of the line of demarcation in subsequent centuries laid a firm basis for Brazil’s claims to vast areas of the interior of South America.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following would be the most suitable topic for a three-page research paper in a British literature course? Stuck be
    5·1 answer
  • What was the result of farmers protesting the whiskey tax in 1794?
    15·2 answers
  • Neolithic people practiced metallurgy. How did the advancement in technology benefit early humans?
    12·2 answers
  • Was the men of the woodland tribes responsible for farming and building their homes?​
    8·1 answer
  • The Republican Party in the House of Representatives has recently proposed a new tax bill that would cut corporate taxes for the
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement illustrates the system of checks and balances at work?
    15·2 answers
  • What strategies should someone when grieving a loss
    12·2 answers
  • What conditions occur during a storm
    13·1 answer
  • The techniques of joining, boundary setting, unbalancing, reframing, ordeals, enactments, and paradoxical interventions are most
    8·1 answer
  • You have been tasked with the replacement of ospf with eigrp throughout your organization, which consists of a mixture of cisco
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!