Given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
<h3>What is a Rectangle?</h3>
- A rectangle is a quadrilateral.
- All four angles in a rectangle are right angles.
- The opposite sides of a rectangle are parallel and congruent to each other.
Therefore, based on what we are given and the definition of a rectangle, we can establish that △URS ≅ △STU by SAS.
Since △URS ≅ △STU, therefore ∠USR = ∠SUT by CPCTC.
In conclusion, given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
Learn more about properties of rectangle on:
brainly.com/question/2835318
You could use photomath for thiss!
A is not right. Half the cookie would have an angle of 180
B is not right. 4 pieces would have an angle of 288
C is correct. 360/5 is 72 degrees
D is not right. 2 pieces would have an angle of 144
E is correct 90<144 so a 90 degree angle would fit in 2 pieces
