Answer:
A. The trade-off a firm faces when using retained earnings or borrowed funds is the same.
Explanation:
- A trade-off is based on the situational decisions that usually involve the loss of quality and a property that is set or designed to give a return in the other aspects.
- As one part has to increase and the other has to decrease. The trade-off is commonly expressed as in the terms of opportunity costs which states the loss of the best alternative.
Answer:
That statement is true.
Explanation:
Basically, You put your money in saving if you intended to use that money for future consumption. You put your money in investment if you intended to make financial gain out of it.
For example,
Let's say that you want to buy a laptop that cost $700. You only able to spend $350 per month since you have to consider other more important payment such as rent or food. So you set aside $350 for two month and purchase the laptop at the end of the second month. This is an example of saving.
In another case let's say that you put that $350 in Bonds rather than purchasing laptop. You Let that bond mature and take a 3% interest as profit. Two month later, the value of your money is increased. This is an example of an investment.
Answer:
A) 200 units
Explanation:
mean daily demand = 20 calculators
standard deviation = 4 calculators
lead time = 9 days
z-critical value (for 95% in-stock probability) = 1.96
normal consumption during lead-time:
= mean demand × lead time
= 20 × 9
= 180 calculators
safety stock = z × SD × √L
= 1.96 × 4 × √9
= 1.96 × 4 × 3
= 23.52 calculators
reorder point = normal consumption + safety stock
= 180 + 23.52
= 203.52 calculators
Answer:
A. Decrease
Explanation:
In investment appraisal with the method of Net Present Value, the bone of contention and the central matter is the TIME VALUE OF MONEY.
In the above scenario, the initial working capital was 100% released in proportions of 40%, 40% and 20%, throughout the 3 years of the project. However, if the reverse had been the case, i.e. parting with more cash now and the requirement of working capital now becomes: Year 0 = -10,000, Year 1 = - 10,000, Year 2 = -10,000, Year 3 = +30,000; the NPV would definitely shrink because the value of 10,000 each in Years 0-2 would not be the same when it is recovered from the project in year 3. The value will be smaller and hence the NPV of the project would have decreased as a result of the time value of money.
I would say it’s true because it does have some facts in it
