GAULT CASE CHANGED JUVENILE LAW

1 answer:

4 0

The effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion is that It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for its actions. Option C

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?</h3>

Generally, If the Office's findings, conclusions, or recommendations have any legal implications, they must be handled by a Legal Expert, who may be an Advisor, Associate Advisor, Consultant, or another official with relevant credentials and expertise in the law.

In conclusion, By having legal experts on the panel, the interviewer is able to demonstrate how the system avoids accountability. C as a viable alternative

You might be interested in

WILL MARK BRAINLEST IF RIGHT

Liono4ka [1.6K]

Agree, because you should never give up especially when you're treated unfairly.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Your cousin Eric called to tell you he’d be in the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade and asked you to text when his float was on TV

arsen [322]

Answer:

you forgot to press send or the person sending it service was bad

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

URGENT, WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!! And Five stars+Thanks

Troyanec [42]

The colony of Pennsylvania was established by William Penn as a 'Holy Experiment'. It was given to him by the king in 1681, in payment of a debt he had to Penn's father. Amongst the other English colonies, Penn was the first leader of his colony that established peace with the natives. Then Penn made a peace treaty with the Leni lenape indians, and bought land from them. He hadn't needed to, but did anyways, and it was this act, as well as other kind acts towards the natives that formed peace between them. This also ensured a prosperous beginning for the new settlers of Pennsylvania, as the natives helped them with their crops, learning the way of the land and many such other useful things. Neither did they have wars that hurt the population

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The scientific method is often described as self-correcting and cyclical. Briefly describe your understanding of the scientific

GenaCL600 [577]

Answer:

The scientific method is the process in which, ideas in form of hypotheses, are tested against the real world through evidence which is obtained from observation of phenomena.

Explanation:

The scientific method is self correcting in the sense that, it involves coming up with an idea, then making an hypothesis, then making the observation which shall be tested against the idea. Further there is experimentation to confirm the validity of the hypothesis.

All of the above are testing mechanisms, that scientist use to provoke their idea with the real world facts, in the process, the idea might prove wrong and thereby shall have self corrected.

Scientific knowledge is cynical in the sense that, at each stage, we expect to prove the hypotheses wrong.

4 0

3 years ago

What might max weber suggest is the primary difference between a lawyer in the united states and the self-made millionaire of a

Naddika [18.5K]

Wealth, power, and prestige--these three elements make up Weber's theory of social class.

In the case above, both have power over others, but their wealth is likely different as the self-made man is a millionaire and lawyers don't typically make that much. The biggest difference would likely be the level of prestige or respect each would get from others. The US values the self-made man over a lawyer.

5 0

3 years ago