Answers with Explanations:
1. How is peace communicated?
"Peace" may be communicated in various ways. It can be communicated in our everyday lives such as<em> interacting with people.</em> The <em>media</em> and<em> television</em> are also means to communicate peace to a larger audience. Some communicate peace by using the Internet, such as publishing a journal.
2. What is meant by social peace?
"Social peace" refers to the process of<em> maintaining harmony</em> in social relationships. It tries to <em>avoid misunderstanding</em> or <em>disagreements </em>and looks for <u>solutions</u> in order to<u> prevent interpersonal conflicts</u>.
3. How can we always be peaceful?
We can always be peaceful if we are, firstly, at peace with our selves. It is an important factor to prevent a cluttered mind. Secondly, we should have empathy or understanding on how other people feel. This is essential in order to properly respond to them. We can only do this if we put ourselves in their shoes.
Answer: B. Consider your actions in providing care to be appropriate
Explanation: Since this is a person with a history of schizophrenia, there is a certain procedure in different crisis situations. Here, in this case, the man showed a crisis as a consequence of mental disorder, and after that he tried to kill himself by cutting his wrists and bleeding profusely, which if not done anything could be fatal at once. A situation where a man has cut his wrists is urgent, that is, emergency, and requires immediate reaction. So, the consequence of a crisis situation is an emergency. In this case, there is a distinction between crisis and emergency; this is about emergency. In the case of an emergency, which is not the same as a crisis situation, the procedure that has been carried out in this case is perfectly appropriate and the court will treat it accordingly.
the term assumptive worlds is used to refer to the idea that people live and function on certain beliefs about reality.
From the excerpt, I conclude that the Maya forefathers believed it was the fate of animals to be hunted and eaten. The key segment of this text is "Accept your destiny. Your flesh shall be torn to pieces." The forefathers mention they have changed their mind because animals were not able to adore or obey them.
Because animals cannot adore their creators, "there shall be those" who will be able to do all of this. These "others" are the humans, who will hunt and eat animals. Animals will then have to accept their destiny and "be changed," being sent to the ravines and the woods.
I think that the most reasonable conclusion is answer D.
