Answer:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
And based on this the best option for this case is:
Ha: μregular > μspecial H0: μregular = μspecial
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case the interest is verify if the true average amount of warpage for that laminate is less than for the regular laminate.
Let's put notation:
represent the true mean for the amount of warpage for the regular laminate
represent the true mean for the amount of warpage for the special laminate
And based on the claim, the correct system of hypothesis are:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
And based on this the best option for this case is:
Ha: μregular > μspecial H0: μregular = μspecial
You're finding the y value from the function here. Basically, what the function equals is the y value.
Since you're finding the y value from the x value here, and you added 5 more to the x value in g(x), this means that it was translated 5 units up, because if you increase with the y value, it means that you're moving up on the coordinate graph.
So then your answer would be the third choice: The graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) translated 5 units up.
54=0.75a
0.75 is the decimal form of 75% (75/100) and a is the missing number.
<span>54 = 0.75a
</span>--- ------
0.75 0.75
72 = a
54 is 75% of 72.
Answer:
A.
Step-by-step explanation:
step 1: This is an inverse
step 2: the one over means - substraction
so the answer is A
Answer:
-10<x<0
0<x<4
4<x<8
Step-by-step explanation:
Edg 2020 correct answer