1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Crank
1 year ago
11

Is it reasonable to require the mitigation of damages? If a person is wronged

Law
1 answer:
spayn [35]1 year ago
5 0

When a contract is broken, the concept of mitigation of damages comes into play. It indicates that after the other party breaches a contract, the non-breaching party might be obligated to take action to lessen their damages.

<h3>Give a brief account on Mitigation of damages.</h3>

Damages Mitigation is a type of legal defence frequently used in contract or tort law. The theory of avoidable consequences, as it is often known, is the idea that an injured party cannot be reimbursed for irrational costs incurred as a result of their harm if such costs could have been avoided with reasonable effort.

a. The following information explains if it is acceptable to demand "mitigation of damages": In any situation, it makes sense to mitigate damages since it encourages appropriate action to reduce the amount of loss sustained.

b. The following information explains contract and obligation breaches caused by wrongdoing: The party will not be obligated to the specific contract in the event of a violation. In this case, the individual erred and the other party broke the contract. As a result, since there is no contract, there are no obligations between the parties.

c. The following information explains if the landlord is required to look for a new tenant before the contract expires : In this instance, the landlord is able to prevent the loss brought on by the tenant's violation. Therefore, the landlord has a duty to find another renter before the end of the contract in order to prevent those losses.

To know more about, mitigation of damages, visit :

brainly.com/question/28190796

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Drag the tiles to the boxes to complete the pairs.
daser333 [38]

Answer:

what are options o did not understand this question

6 0
3 years ago
Anyone who marks me brainlist gets 100 POINTS!!!!!
kondaur [170]

Answer:

THANK U FOR THE PTS

Explanation:

HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Your perception time is always the same.<br> A. TRUE<br> B. FALSE
Anastasy [175]
Your answer is false .
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the United States Supreme Court, how did Ollie's Barbecue engage in interstate commerce?
Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

Explanation:

According to the United States Supreme Court, how did Ollie's Barbecue engage in interstate commerce?

6 0
2 years ago
The notions of victim facilitation, precipitation, and provocation have been derived from the broader theme of shared responsibi
arsen [322]

Answer:

<h3>The notions of victim facilitation, precipitation, and provocation focuses on the victim's responsibility in prevailing a crime.</h3>

Explanation:

The notion of victim facilitation states that certain crimes occur because of victim's negligence. The victim is held equally responsible in the crime because of carelessness or by his/her mistakes.

The notion of precipitation applies to the acts that the victim contributes in making himself/herself a victim of a crime. For instance, when one tries to rob an armed person and in that process he/she gets shot, the notion of precipitation applies here.

The notion of provocation applies to those victims who gets victimized when they attack someone and the other person attacks them back severely in self-defense.

All three notions apply to the broader theme of shared responsibility. They are used in describing a victim's role in aiding a crime to occur. However, the notion of victim facilitation does not equally share the same concept of direct consequence as the other two notions. The notion of victim facilitation often justifies victim's role as accidental and unintentional. On the other hand, the two other notions both contributes directly as a consequence of their acts.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the first amendment
    8·2 answers
  • A garden table And a Bench 910 combined The garden table cost 60 more than the bench
    5·1 answer
  • In Abel v. Baker, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a contract for the sale of a car. Now a trial court in th
    11·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    9·2 answers
  • The Virginian General assembly passes constitutional legislation who ratifies it
    10·1 answer
  • There are several steps to opening a savings account. Select all of these steps.
    14·1 answer
  • What was the Supreme Court's justification for overturning the separate-but-equal doctrine?
    10·1 answer
  • After you'll receive a TLSAE certificate number.
    13·1 answer
  • Please answer quickly if you can:)
    7·1 answer
  • Describe one factor that increases the likelihood for the supreme court to accept an appeal.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!