The type of business that Wally is proposing in the scenario above is partnership. There are three different type of partnership,they are: limited partnership, limited liability partnership and general partnership. Each of these three types provides partners with different level of liability. Thus, Wally was wrong when he said that there could be no personal liability for debts.
Answer:
In order to find the present value of the bond we have to calculate the present value of investment A and subtract is from 1529. We can find the present value of A by discounting all its cash flows.
As the first cash flow is received today and the last will be received 3 years form now there will be a total of 4 cash flows
1) 218.19 (Will not be discounted as we are receiving it today in the present)
2) 218.19/1.0987 (Discount by 1 year as cash will be received in 1 year)
3) 218.19/1.0987^2 (Discount by 2 years as cash will be received in 2 years)
4) 218.19/ 1.0987^3 (Discount by 3 years as cash will be received in 3 years)
= 218.19 + 198.58 + 180.74+ 164.51 = 762.02
PV of Bond = 1529-762.09= 766.91
Semi annual coupons mean 2 payments a year. Bond B matures in 23 years which means a total of 46 payments (23*2). N=46. A coupon rate of 6.4 percent means that the bond pays $64 (0.064*1000) each year. $64 divided by 2 is 32 which is the amount of each semi annual payment Arjen receives. Pv= 766.91 FV = 1000
In a financial calculator put
PV= -766.91
N= 46
FV=1000
PMT= 32
and compute I
I is 4.38 and we will multiply it by 2 because the payments are semi annual. So we will get an I of 8.76
YTM= 0.0876
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Cost=10000
Accumulated depreciation=3000
Sales price=9000
Net value=10000-3000=7000
Gain=9000-7000=2000
Answer:
re 17.4600%
Explanation:
We will calculate using the Modigliani Miller proposition with no taxes to solve for the cost of equity of a levered firm

We plus our values into the formula and solve

re 17.4600%
Answer:
The answer is (B) not all teams are created alike.
Explanation:
This is important since different teams might be composed of differently skilled individuals which might impact their ability to complete the target tasks assigned. When teams that are composed of different skill levels are given similar incentive regardless, it does not reward individual effort and create a stagnant condition.