Answer:
Upward communication
Explanation:
Based on this information it can be said that this is an example of Upward communication. This is a form of communication that encourages employees to communicate directly with their upper management in order to create a sense of importance in employees as they begin to realize that the upper management cares about their thoughts and input. Which is what Steve is cultivating by having regular check-ins
Answer:
b. surpluses of the commodity will develop
Explanation:
A price ceiling is when the government or an agency of the government sets the maximum price for a good or service.
If price ceiling is set above equilibrium price, suppliers would increase supply while consumers would reduce demand. This would lead to an excess supply and surplus in the economy.
When price ceiling is set above equilibrium price, it is known as a non binding price ceiling.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer: Contracts
Explanation: Because the 2 parties are coming to a contractual agreement.
Answer:
1.23
Explanation:
Inventory turnover is a ratio showing how many times a company has sold and replaced inventory during a given period.
Cost of Sales=Opening Inventory+Purchases-Closing Inventory
=5,500+4,000-3,800= 5,700
Average Inventory= Opening + Closing/2
= 5,500+3,800/2= 4,650
Inventory Turnover Ratio= <u>Cost of Sales</u>
Avg Inventory
= 5,700/4,650=1.23
RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:
(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
(2) the representation of one or more clients may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:
(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
