The adaptation is in bold along with its descriptions down below:
Explanation:
CONFORMITY 1. In most cases, people continue to accept the goal and the means to achieve that goal.
In other words, most people continue to go to school and get jobs.
REBELLION 2. Individuals accept the societal goal but use new ways of reaching that goal. For example, individuals may turn to theft, fraud, selling drugs, or other illegal ways of
getting rich.
RITUALISM 3. People reject the goal, but continue to observe the means of reaching the goal. In other words, people may continue to go into their job and do their work, but not believe that they will ever achieve riches by doing so.
RETREATISM 4. People reject both the goal and the means of reaching the goal. Individuals in this category may quit or drop out of normal life, becoming drug users or
alcoholics.
INNOVATION 5. People reject both the goal and the means of reaching the goal, but replace them with different goals and means of reaching them. Often, this adaptation involves individuals seeking to change society. For example, people might reject the goal of gaining wealth, replacing it with seeking an egalitarian society where everyone is equal. Crimes may be committed as these revolutionaries and radials try to change society.
Answer: I believe the answer is B
Explanation:
Answer:
c. He feared the supreme court might invalidate the wagner and social security act
Explanation:
Franklin D. Roosevelt was the president responsible for bringing the country out of the Great Depression through the New Deal. During the early implementation of the new deal, Roosevelt drafted a series of proposals to improve the life of the American worker, many of the labor laws we know of were created during this period, and many of these laws are reproduced in other countries to this day. Two examples of policies designed to protect and assist workers at the time are the wagner and social security acts, which defined retirement concepts and improved labor relations.
Roosevelt believed that both policies would be great for the country, so he tried to change the balance of power in the Supreme Court because he feared that the supreme court would invalidate the acts of wagner and social security.