Answer:
In the ideal sense, if Morgandi can transfer the knowledge she acquired from using the measuring tools while cooking to her math class, she will be able to learn the math quicker.
She will find it much easier than Eric to understand the math lessons about fractions
Morgandi was actively learning about fractions so she was practicing fractions. For Eric, he is probably learning about fractions for the first time so it will take time and practice for him to grasp the concept. If he is learning cognitively, he will need to actively practice fractions, for example, helping their mother cook and using measuring tools.
It will be easier for her as the math class will be like her cookng experience.Her mind may process the information in a way that it relates to her cooking experience.Morgandi is said to bring more interest to the learning situation than Eric.
She already has experience with the subject so it should be easier for her to learn. However, she may have to build her procedural knowledge, such as how to divide and multiply the fractions. Eric, however, who has never used fractions will have to obtain both declarative and procedural knowledge. He will have to learn general knowledge about fractions as well as how to divide and multiply them. Because of this, Eric will most likely take longer to learn the material.
Explanation:
in the learning process, an important factor to look to is what the individual brings to new learning situations. Having a foundational knowledge on which to construct additional knowledge will give one an edge over another as in the case of Morgandi who has a back up experience of cooking than Eric
It pollutes the air and can get people killed by cave in's.
The threat to validity that is likely to occur in the scenario above is Selection Bias.
<h3>What is Selection Bias?</h3>
This occurs when a researcher has control and intentionally chooses those who are going to be researched, observed, or studied. To eliminate this bias, the scientist must ensure that the sample population is selected very randomly.
Other threats to validity are:
- History
- Maturation
- Attrition
- Social Interaction
- Instrumentation
- Testing
- Regression to the mean, etc.
Please see the link below for more about Threat to Validity:
brainly.com/question/4168290
The correct answer is B. Trust, competence and ethos.
The speaker will inspire credibility from the audience when it perceives his or her character and their ethos concerning the topic they are presenting. If they know it really well, they will speak with authority, which will engender trust. Their competence is manifested and it's easier for the audience believe and received what it's being conveyed.
Colonist enslaved american indians and africans so that they can do the work without a high chance of slavery. Colonist tried doing it themselves but died in the process of doing so. In that case, they kidnapped Natives and used them for hard labor. Same with Africans
