Answer:a.Naturalist
Explanation:
A naturalist believes that subjects or participants are able to show their original behavior if they are in their natural environment. A researcher would be more likely to get a true presentation of the participants behaviour if they observe them in their natural environment, if they are not aware that they are under observation. People act normal in normal situations but may alter their behaviour in situations when they know they are being watched.
A naturalist will carry those experiments or research that can't not be done in a lab such as this one of observing women in a shelter.
D prepare you for emergency situations and help you avoid collisions
In was because, in order for Ohio to become a state in the United States, representatives of the territory had to dubmit a constitution to the United States Congress for approval. This was the final requirement under the Northwest Ordinance that Ohio had to meet before coming a state.
I’m not sure, but I hope it helped!
And sorry if it was confusing or bad language, english isn’t my first language
Answer:
D) None of the above
Explanation:
When it comes to strongest risk factor for predicting child abuse or neglect, none of the given options can be regarded as the strongest risk factor or predictor for child abuse or neglect. This is based on the idea that socioeconomic status does not necessarily act as a predictor for child abuse or neglect while culture and religion are also not major risks in this regard. On the other hand, parental history of mental health issues, child abuse or neglect is consider as an important risk factor and predictor when looking at such issues.
In 1896, Homer Plessy broke Louisiana state law that required all African Americans to sit in a certain train car called the Jim Crow boxcar of the train. Plessy argued that <span>Louisiana law violated his constitutional right for "equal protection".</span>
