1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AlekseyPX
1 year ago
11

The majority of cases in the American criminal justice system will proceed to trial.

Law
1 answer:
AVprozaik [17]1 year ago
4 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Only about 2% of criminal cases actually go to trial.  Most are either pleaded (about 90%) down or dismissed (about 8%).  There are lots of legal sites where you can see these stats.

You might be interested in
On February 2019, Melinda applies and nominates herself for the prestigious North American Literary Prize. In June 2019, she win
spin [16.1K]

Answer:

Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.

Explanation:

Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .

3 0
3 years ago
What is a free lawyer
kati45 [8]
Pro Bono lawyer or pro Bono attorney or state attorney
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mia hawk works as a secretary at buildco. , a large construction company that specializes in government contracts. Mia is in cha
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Yes, Buildco. Legally remove mia because Mia did not report activity to the essential individuals or entities.

<h3>Whistleblower</h3>

A whistleblower is an individual, often an employee, who reveals data about activity within a private/public organization that is deemed illegal, corrupt, illicit, unsafe, or fraudulent. Whistleblowers can use a combination of internal or external channels to share information or allegations.

<h3>What is a whistleblower at work?</h3>

A whistleblower is someone who declares workplace conditions that he or she believes to be unsafe or illegal. You can't avenge a whistleblower for documenting injuries, safety concerns, or other protected activities.

To learn more about whistleblowers visit the link

brainly.com/question/10649836

#SPJ4

7 0
9 months ago
VERY POLITICAL QUESTION
storchak [24]

Answer:

Chicken Wing

Explanation:

They are just better in my opinion

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a separate system of justice for juveniles? Be sure to fully explain your reasons.
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

Explanation:

Age is the most significant clear measure isolating the adolescent court from the grown-up criminal court. State laws shift in the base and greatest age limitations. Under precedent-based law, the base age for considering an individual responsible for criminal conduct is 7. Most extreme age is the age when an individual is characterized as a grown-up and not, at this point subject to the authority of adolescent court. Most states set the greatest age at 17 years old or underneath.

Police caution

Police practice gigantic prudence in managing adolescent guilty parties. They have the accompanying choices:

Discharge and caution.

Discharge and document a report.

Take the adolescent to the police headquarters and make a referral to a network youth‐services organization.

Allude to adolescent court consumption, without confinement.

Allude to adolescent court admission, with detainment.

More than 70 percent of the adolescents who are captured by the police are alluded to the court. Yet, numerous contacts between the police and adolescents are never recorded on the grounds that the police handle things casually. For offenses, for example, check in time infringement, fleeing, and intruding, the police may caution the adolescent as well as educate the guardians. Now and then police allude adolescents to social‐service offices, a training called redirection, which expels the adolescent from the adolescent equity framework and evades any negative results that may connect to naming a young "reprobate."

A police or school referral to adolescent court can be made with or without detainment. Confinement is the transitory imprisoning of young people who are anticipating demeanor of their cases. Most state laws require a confinement hearing under the steady gaze of an adolescent court judge can hear a case. The intention is to conclude whether to discharge the youngster to their folks or hold care. The significant purposes for securing up adolescents detainment focuses are

To make sure about their quality at court procedures.

To hold the individuals who can't be sent home in light of the fact that parental oversight is deficient.

To keep them from hurting themselves and to forestall wrongdoings (preventive confinement).

In 1994, more than 12,000 misconduct cases were moved to grown-up criminal court by a procedure called confirmation (waiver of ward). State and government resolutions indicate the time of youthful wrongdoers (typically 16 or 17) at which criminal courts have locale and accommodate waiver. The choice with respect to whether to move a case is made by an adolescent court judge at an exchange hearing.

In certain states, waivers can apply to adolescents over the age of 16 paying little mind to offense. In different states waivers can happen just for lawful offenses. The impact of a waiver is to deny an adolescent the security of the adolescent court and to expose the adolescent to the chance of getting cruel discipline. The Supreme Court governed in Stanford v. Kentucky (1989) that capital punishment can be forced for wrongdoings submitted by adolescents as youthful as 16.

Arbitration in adolescent court

During an arbitration (or fact‐finding) hearing, an adolescent court judge chooses whether or not there is verification past a sensible uncertainty to name a young "reprobate." Rights stood to adolescents incorporate

The option to notice of charges.

The option to advise.

The option to stand up to witnesses.

The privilege to cross‐examine witnesses.

The benefit against self‐incrimination.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need help writing a 200 word juvenile court essay, pls help :)
    14·1 answer
  • If you find yourself boxed in by a vehicle on your left out right, ____ to clear space beside you
    5·1 answer
  • The number of members of the Senate as compared to the House of Representatives is
    6·2 answers
  • Alcohol abuse is intentional overuse.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    10·1 answer
  • Since substance use changes the way that a person thinks, it is common...
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these may not be protected under the attorney-client privilege?
    14·1 answer
  • The right to privacy stems from the _____ found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
    15·1 answer
  • Name the steps on How a Bill Becomes a law?
    11·1 answer
  • my original brainly account got deleted how do i get it back it has a xxx.tentacion profile picture on it with all my friends an
    7·2 answers
  • ——-Heighten aggressive or hostile behavior and distort the drivers decision making process
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!