Answer:
All of the following comparisons between the House and the Senate are true EXCEPT.
The House of Representatives was model after the British House of the lord's where's the Senate was model after the House of commons.
Answer:
bonjour a toi désolé je ne peux pas maintenir
Explanation:
pa cerveau moins
Answer to the following question is as follows;
⇒ The Legality of Danny's Proposal;
- In this case, Danny's proposal is regarded an offer until it is approved by Alan in the market. As Danny's promised to sell 100 motorcycles for US$1000 each.
- The proposal from Danny's perspective is an offer since Alan did not acknowledge the agreement in the beginning. Once acknowledged by Allen, this exchanging of bikes becomes an offer.
⇒ Allan's response;
- Allan's response, on the other hand, was interpreted as offer and acceptance because no agreement was reached among them and Allan takes the bike only when it is in good shape.
- If the bikes are not in excellent condition, Allen has the right to decline the seller's contract at any moment.
Learn more about "Legal proposal"
brainly.com/question/13460236?referrer=searchResults
The correct option is (c); Yes, because the court took all well-pleaded facts in the complaint as true and resolved all doubts and inferences in the defendant's favor.
<h3>What is third-part defendant?</h3>
A third-party defendant is a person or entity that the primary defendant sues and adds to the case under the theory that they are accountable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim.
For the given case:
- The court must accept as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and resolve any questions and inferences in the complainant's favor before deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. The complainant in this case is the defendant.
- Answer option A is erroneous because the third-party defendant's move was a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be given, not a petition to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Furthermore, not withstanding the lack of diversity of citizenship, the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the defendant's contribution complaint since it is based on federal law, even though it may raise the question of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on its own.
- B is the incorrect response option. The court may only take into account the claims in the complaint, any exhibits attached to the complaint, and any matters susceptible to judicial notice when deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. (Remember that for a request for summary judgment, the court could take into account outside information like an affidavit.)
- Because any party against whom a claim is made may file a motion to dismiss for failure to articulate a claim upon which relief can be given, answer choice D is wrong.
To know more about jurisdiction and its types, here
brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Answer: sociological
Explanation:
This is because the society influences the public the most due to peer group
