Answer:
This is called an Arraignment;
Explanation:
This is where a bail, the defendant stating if he is innocent or Guilty, etc. This is where the constitutional right to understand your charges you're being faced with, you're accuser, ultimately a Judge would be set, for the case. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
4 Major Instruments used for Making International Payments are Foreign Bills of Exchange; Bank Drafts; Telegraphic Transfer; Letter of Credit.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
To make payments in the foreign countries the instruments used are Foreign Bills of Exchange, Bank Drafts and Telegraphic Transfers and Letter of Credit. Each of these instruments mentioned as different methodologies in sending the money to the foreign banks. 
Let us explain one by one; Foreign Bills of Exchange money drawn from country is payable at another country. Bank draft which is drawn on bank funds and payment assurance is made by the bank that issues it. 
Telegraphic Transfer is an electronic method of fund transfer used mainly for overseas wire transactions. And final one is Letter of Credit is a letter given by the bank assuring that a buyer's payment to a seller will be received on time and for the correct amount.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The electoral college is working the way it is supposed to. 
Explanation:
The president of the United States is the President of all the lands owned by the US, not the president of only the major cities. The Electoral College was created to balance out the population with the land. For example, if we take into account and allow the Democrats to get what they want (i.e., popular vote), it will lead to large segments of the population being cut off from the political realm. With the popular vote only, candidates will only reach out to large population areas, as they have the higher chances of receiving the message and to vote for them. In the end, the electoral college is in place to ensure that all groups of the US, no matter where they live, are reached out too. The Popular vote is not the way to go, and if the Democrats want to get rid of the Electoral College, they must put in a system that is better than it. Remember, the Electoral College, while it does has it's faults, solves a gruesome problem of keeping the president from being the president of the major cities, to being the president of the land. 
~
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.
<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>
The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.
Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions.  We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer.  Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.
Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000.  And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.
Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.
Learn more  about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487
 
        
             
        
        
        
Congress attempted to grant this power to the president by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
The congress of the United States of America has granted certain powers to the president to nullify the part of the bill and that is called line item veto. This can also be termed as partial veto. 
The line item veto will give powers to the president to cancel certain provision in the bill and namely budget appropriation bill without vetoing the entire legislative bill. 
Supreme Court of America as ruled that it is unconstitutional and it stated that Line Item Veto Act of 1996 has violated the fundamental principle of the presidential clause of the constitution.