It's not so important that it be recycled ... after all, there's almost a limitless supply,
and there's no danger of ever running out of it.
What's important is to keep carbon out of the atmosphere. In order to do that, we
need to reduce the amount of it that's released during so many of the processes
that we've been doing on a huge scale for the past 200 years, and invent ways
to capture the carbon that we DO continue to release, before it gets into the
atmosphere.
The Answer Is...Eosinophil
<span>Waves in a given area typically have a range of heights. For weather reporting and for scientific analysis of wind wave statistics, their characteristic height over a period of time is usually expressed as significant wave height. This figure represents an average height of the highest one-third of the waves in a given time period (usually chosen somewhere in the range from 20 minutes to twelve hours), or in a specific wave or storm system. HOPE IT HELPS</span>
Answer:
Researchers need a lot of data to monitor a species population because the environment is very diverse in types of species found at different places .
What happens to one part of it could affect the population of other animals, humans, and may also effect the ecosystem of that certain environmental region .
Answer:
the point of science is to disprove hypothesis so having a hypothesis that doesn't allow that to happen is not good science
2. they don't fit in our mouths so are a trait from when we had larger jaws
3. bones of your lower jaw, middle ear and voice box (they aren't actually gills fyi, they just look like them)
4. likely yes as their bones were hollow but likely only able to fly short distances, the thought was that they couldn't do their size and weight but with hollow bones they were able to like a quail would
5. no because they could be sister taxa, you would have a hard time proving exactly that this new fossil is the common ancestor that birds came from to replace the old hypothesis (guess) of which one did.
Explanation:
