1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lys-0071 [83]
2 years ago
10

Kong took 15% fewer seconds than Nolan took to complete his multiplication timed test. Kong took 85 seconds. How many seconds di

d Nolan take?
Mathematics
2 answers:
Inga [223]2 years ago
8 0
85 x .15 = 12.75
85 + 12.75 = 97.75
Answer: Nolan took 97.75 Seconds
MatroZZZ [7]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Nolan took 100 seconds

Step-by-step explanation:

Topic: One unknown equation

let' s assing some variables

K = time took by kong to complete the mult test

N = time took by Nolan to complete the mult test

you ca express  the time took by Kong in terms of Nolan's taken time like this

K = N - 15%N (15% less)

the problem says that K took 85 seconds so we have that

K = 85 s

let's replace this in the equation

85 = N - 15%N let's Factorize

85 = N(1-15%)

so we have that

N = 85 / (1-15%)  or N = 85 / (1-0.15)

N = 85 / (0.85) = 100 s

So Nolan took 100 seconds to fullfil the mult test

You might be interested in
Ji-yoon's bill at the restaurant was $45.10. She left a tip of 18%.
Aleks [24]
Answer is $8.118.....
4 0
2 years ago
An auto repair shop charged a customer $496 to repair a car. The bill listed $96 for parts and the remainder for labor. If the c
Tpy6a [65]
It took 10 hours of labor to repair the car
3 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME IM BEGGING
brilliants [131]
I think it’s going to be 16%
8 0
3 years ago
of 5.25 newtons acts on an object of unknown mass at a distance of 6.9 x 10^8 meters from the center of Earth. To increase the f
schepotkina [342]
Hey

The nice thing about this question is that you don't actually need to worry about numbers until the very end! It's just a matter of setting up the right equation. First of all, remember Newton's law of universal gravitation:<span>F=<span><span>G<span>m1</span><span>m2</span></span><span>r2</span></span></span>Where F is the force of gravity between the two objects, G is the gravitational constant, m(1) is the mass of one object, m(2) is the mass of the other object, and r is the distance between the two objects. We can rearrange this equation to solve for G instead (you'll see why this is important soon):<span>G=<span><span>F<span>r2</span></span><span><span>m1</span><span>m2</span></span></span></span>We have two situations here: (a) (the starting position of the objects) and (b) (the final position of the objects). We can use Newton's Law of gravitation to describe the force of gravity between these two objects during situations (a) and (b), but we can actually set these equations equal to one another because the value of G will be the same in both (it's a constant!) - now you see why I rearranged the equation above.<span><span><span><span>Fa</span><span>r2a</span></span><span><span>m<span>1a</span></span><span>m<span>2a</span></span></span></span>=<span><span><span>Fb</span><span>r2b</span></span><span><span>m<span>1b</span></span><span>m<span>2b</span></span></span></span></span>I know this equation looks a bit messy, so let's simplify is a bit. The masses of the objects are the same in both situations (we're dealing with the unknown object and the Earth both times), so we can take both those guys out of the equation:<span><span><span>Fa</span><span>r2a</span></span>=<span><span>Fb</span><span>r2b</span></span></span>Already it's looking better! We also know we want the force in the situation (b) to be 2.5 times the force in the situation (a). In other words, F(b) = 2.5F(a). We can plug that into the equation, and then solve becomes very easy:<span><span><span>Fa</span><span>r2a</span></span>=<span>2.5<span>Fa</span><span>r2b</span></span></span><span><span>r2a</span>=<span>2.5<span>r2b</span></span></span><span><span>rb</span>=<span><span>ra</span><span>2.5<span>−−−</span>√</span></span></span><span><span>rb</span>=<span><span>6.9×<span>108</span></span><span>2.5<span>−−−</span>√</span></span></span><span><span>rb</span>=4.4×<span>108</span></span><span> So the new distance would have to be 4.4 x 10^8 m for the force to be 2.5 times as great. Notice how the fact that the original force was 5.25 N doesn't actually matter! And this answer also makes sense because you would expect the gravitational force to become stronger as you move the objects closer together. If you have any questions please let me know!</span>

Hoped I Helped
8 0
2 years ago
In 2004, Kenenisa Bekele of Ethiopia ran 5,000 meters (5 kilometers) in
alexdok [17]
That answer to that question is distance= 3.1 miles
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The measures of the angles of a triangle are in a ratio of $3:5:7$. what is the degree measure of the largest angle?
    9·1 answer
  • Find (f-g)(x). Help please
    9·2 answers
  • Cheddar cheese costs £7.50 for 1kg<br> Marie buys 200g of cheese <br> How much does she pay
    9·1 answer
  • Which triangles can have two sides of the same lenghth
    8·1 answer
  • Answer question above. Will mar brainli if you give explanation!
    7·2 answers
  • What is the value of x? (Type an integer or a decimal.)
    11·1 answer
  • A model for P is P(d) = 10 - (1.08)
    11·1 answer
  • Please help this is due tomorrow ​
    8·1 answer
  • Does anyone know this? Please help! ASAP!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Interior and Exterior Triangle Angles (0/5)
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!