Answer:
A is the answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
A fraction plus a fraction is equal to a fraction. An irrational number cannot be expressed as a fraction.
0.3333333 even though it looks like an irrational number it is actually: 1/3
3/5 is already a fraction so adding it with another fraction will NOT equal an irrational number (decimal)
-0.75 is equal to -3/4 (75/100 => 3/4). Same thing that applies above.
However, Pi cannot be expressed as a fraction exactly. You can round up like 3.14. However it is not the full number. So 3.141592654....+(3/4) is not going to add up perfectly into a fraction.
In short, a fraction is a rational number. Rational + Rational = Rational. Irrational + Rational = Irrational.
On the unit circle:
( 1, 0 ) corresponds to 0.
( 0, 1 ) corresponds to π/2
( -1, 0 ) corresponds to π
( 0, - 1 ) corresponds to 3π/2
- π = π
Answer:
D ) ( - 1 , 0 )
Find the length of one side.
V = s^3
s = cube root of V
V = 729
s = cube root 729
s = 9
Put this into your calculator as 729^0.333333333
It should bring back 9 or 8.999999 something which means 9.
Net
The net is shown below. You will have to do the labeling. But I can tell you what you should label each face as?
Area of one face = s^2
s = 9
Area of one face = 9*9
Area of one face = 81
So when you draw this, each face should be labeled with 81.
It should have it's units (ft^2) if your marker is picky.
Part C
There are 6 sides.
1 side has an area of 81 ft^2
6 sides have an area of 6*81 = 486 ft^2
The graph that has a slop of -1 and the y-interecept is 4
that graph is the 1st picture and top one
In math, an isometry is a congruent transformation in which the distance (or length) and the angle is preserved or remains the same even after the transformation.
The transformation can be translation, rotation, reflection, etc.
Let us not use this definition of isometry to answer our question, one at a time.
(I) In here, as we can see the distances 10 and 5 and the angle 43 degrees has been preserved. So, <u>this is an isometry.</u>
(II) In here, distances have been halved, so this is<u> not an isometry</u>, even though the angles have been preserved.
(III) In here, the corresponding distances and the angles have been preserved. So, <u>this is an isometry.</u>
