The Articles of Confederation were discarded in favor of a stronger more centralized federal government because of problems in governing that were associated with weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles failed to allow the national government to collect taxes, resolve inter-state disputes, and govern effectively more generally. Therefore, at the Constitutional Convention they decided to scrap the Articles and write an entirely new Constitution.
The <em>person </em>who Maria should contact to find out if she is allowed to use the nickname is:
- <u>The original author of the popular book series</u>
According to the given question, we are asked to show the person who Maria would contact if she would make use of a nickname from a popular book series and also using similar personality features.
As a result of this, we can see that if Maria goes ahead to make use of this nickname, she could be sued for intellectual theft because she is not only <em>using the same nickname</em>, but also same personality traits.
With this in mind, Maria should contact the owner of the popular book series to <em>get her consent</em> to make use of the nickname.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/20901151
Answer: Sutton's offense will not be recorded because it is part of what is called the dark figure of the crime.
Explanation:
In the field of criminology or sociology, the dark figure of the crime can be defined as the number of crimes that have not been reported or discovered.
Just as many reported crimes are seen daily and investigations to find out who has committed it, there are also times where crimes cannot be proven due to lack of evidence or perhaps they happened but were never reported.
Situations have been seen where innocent people are convicted of poor evidence or people who are guilty but lack of evidence cannot ensure that the person is guilty. There are also cases where there are crimes that are not reported because the person does not trust justice or the person may feel guilty for what happened to him.
In the case of Sutton, although it is true that at the end of the day he did not steal anything and that the owner of the house could not detect anything because everything was intact, this does not mean that the crime did not happen. If the owner of the house had security cameras or found Sutton in the house, it would have been proof that he was trying to steal even if he didn't carry anything.
If Sutton had been found there would be chances of being imprisoned or other judicial actions would have been taken because entering a house without permission and that is a crime.
Answer:
theres a river that separates it
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Because the colonists had not control over what parliament did to them.
