Answer:
c. very little unsystematic risk.
Explanation:
The first option is wrong because a diversified portfolio can only lockout unsystematic risk which is due to a particular business sector and not the risk emanating from the whole market which is systematic in nature.
The second option is also wrong because systematic risk cannot be diversified away.
Answer:
DR Interest receivable 26,400
CR Interest revenue 26,400
Explanation:
As first lease has already been paid, the amount left of the lease is;
= 280,000 - 40,000
=$240,000
Interest is 11% so the interest to be received in December is;
= 11% * 240,000
= $26,400
This will be debited to Interest receivable as it is money owed and credited to Interest revenue as it is money earned.
Answer:
The answer is 
"".
Explanation:
![\to [\$500,000 (\frac{1}{3} \times \$1,500,000) + \$250,000 (\frac{1}[3} \times \$750,000 + \$450,000 (\frac{1}[2} \times \$900,000]\\\\\\to \$1,200,000](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cto%20%5B%5C%24500%2C000%20%28%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5C%241%2C500%2C000%29%20%2B%20%5C%24250%2C000%20%28%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%5B3%7D%20%20%5Ctimes%20%5C%24750%2C000%20%2B%20%5C%24450%2C000%20%28%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%5B2%7D%20%20%5Ctimes%20%5C%24900%2C000%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cto%20%5C%241%2C200%2C000)
Though this tree farm is jointly held, Aiden is assumed to have given 1/3 of the treatment because his mother gave her a gift to create the lease. The tenancy of the major chunk is subjected to the fifty percent spouse exclusion rule. None of the structures is included as Chloe does not escape Aiden.
Answer:
a.67.9%.
Explanation:
Debt to Total Assets Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Assets x 100
<em>Total Liabilities = $95,000,000
</em>
<em>Total Assets = $140,000,000
</em>
Debt to Total Assets Ratio = $95,000,000 / $140,000,000 x 100
Debt to Total Assets Ratio = 0.679 x 100
or
Debt to Total Assets Ratio = 67.9%
Hence, The Assets of Marker Co. are 67.9% funded by creditors.
