<em><u>Yo</u></em><em>ur answer would be rounded about </em><u><em>140</em></u> because first rectangle =108divided by 9 = 12 which was the the perimeter of the rectangle plus the 90 degree right triangle which was about 36 so there.
Answer:
17/6
So this is the answer. If you want to convert to decimal... The answer will be 2.83..hope it is right
<span>To do this, let f(1) = 5 and f(n) = f(n-1) for n greater than 1. This is recursive rule and each term is the same because it eventually becomes f(1), which is 5.</span>
Answer:
5
Step-by-step explanation:
divide the figure as a triangle and a rectangle first.
take away the rectangle part and if you just look at the triangle part,
you can get x using Pythagorean theorem.
Pythagorean theorem is a^2 + b^2 = c^2,
so 3^2 + 4^2 = x^2.
If you calculate it, x should be root 25, which equals 5.
So, the answer is 5.
Answer:
- <u><em>See explanation below: either 0.984 cm or 0.85 cm depending on the complete question.</em></u>
Explanation:
The question is incomplete and, thus, ambiguos.
There are two plausible interpretations: either each side of the prism has a leght of 4.92 cm, or the the units of the given measured is not cm but cm³ and 4.92 is the volume of the prism.
<u>Considering the first option:</u>
The best side length is the first decimal number that divides exactly 4.92cm
- That is 4.92/5 = 0.984 cm
<u>Considering the second option</u>
<u>T</u>he correct question would be "<em>If you fill a 4.92 cm³ prism with cubes who’s sides lengths are less than 1 cm what size would be the best"</em>
<em />
The best size of the sides lentgths is one that occupies the greatest part of each length.
Assume the prism is a cube. Then, the legth of each side is:
![\sqrt[3]{4.92}=1.70](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B4.92%7D%3D1.70)
The greatest decimal number that divides 1.70 exactly is: