Answer:
What was the population density of the region.
Explanation:
In process of elimination, the materials available are the ones that are found. The items found also show how the people lived, were they rich or poor? The items found can also show what the people valued, how many of these items were found? Were they found in protective casings or close to people's homes? The population density is harder to find based only on artifacts and is therefore the least likely.
A character of nationalism is to conquer and expand empire to include land seen as part of the national heritage. The Alsace-Lorraine region had been disputed land between Germany and France. The area had moved back forth many times cause war between the two nations. France wanting to regain the area was an attempt to reintegrate French people under the French flag.
The first laws that penalized food
and drug adulteration is the The Adulteration of Food and Drugs Act 1860, which
was later revised in 1872, and the Sale of Food and Drugs Act 1875. Adulteration
was a thing before, but it caused illnesses to many workers that the industry
people have to pressure the government to pass anti-adulteration laws to reduce
absenteeism of their workers. The laws outlawed a lot of adulteration practices
and also made provisions for appointments of public analysts to inspect food
and drugs.
Answer: The crossing brought many benefits to humanity.
Explanation:
The transition from the Paleolithic to the Neolithic contributed to the development and improvement of human life quality. In the Paleolithic, the man was constantly searching for food and led a nomadic lifestyle. Such a way of life carried a lot of risks. During the Neolithic, man domesticated certain plant and animal species to have a safe source of food in one place.
The nomadic lifestyle was characterized by the migration of man in caves and living in smaller communities. This changed during the Neolithic. Man organizes permanent habitats, which provided prehistoric communities with greater security.
Most of early history, these was no seperation of church and state, so they were one and the same.
This applies to both the English civil war ( if you can call any war civil) and the Dutch revolt. Both were to end Catholic domination of the Protasant subjects.
All wars are both religious and political. But end up anti-religious as they violate the very tenets of any religion they expound so it is only being about power.
Protasants revolted against the Catholics for freedom but then in-fighting over which Protasant religion is good.
The politics of any war are power and greed. Someone wants what someone else has and demands the right to take it and deny others taking it from them.
Many claim they are trying to protect the ' true' religion or claim for religious freedom and then show they are no better then the heritics they decry and deny others the same freedoms they want,
When all is said and done - all is just for power.
War has never settled any differences. It just pospones the reversal of power as will always happen. The French Revolution almost did by beheading the royals but as many escaped and Napolian brought new ones in. Nothing much changed.
The American revolution - which was the 1st non-religious war started the change for wars to not just be about religion.
