In 2005, 23 is in the second deviation
19 22 25 28 31 33 35
In 1965, 23 is in the third deviation.
12 14 16 18 20 22 24
<span>By the way, 13.5% range from 22 to 25 in 2005, while 2.1% range from 22 to 24 in 1965</span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Students use algebra to solve equations (of the form px + q = r and p(x + q) = r where p, q, and r are specific rational numbers); using techniques of making zero (adding the additive inverse) and making one (multiplying by the multiplicative inverse) to solve for the variable.
Students identify and compare the sequence of operations used to find the solution to an equation algebraically, with the sequence of operations used to solve the equation with tape diagrams. They recognize the steps as being the same.
Students solve equations for the value of the variable using inverse operations; by making zero (adding the additive inverse) and making one (multiplying by the multiplicative inverse).
Answer:
50/50. there is no outside force that decides otherwise
Since the sample size is too small (n = 9, which is less than 10) we cannot use the normal model to describe the entire population.
Therefore, we expect the sample mean to be different from the population mean.
Yes that is right
x=-4 is a vertical line passing through the points (-4,y)
where y can be any value
