All categories

1 year ago

explain the joke, “There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don’t.”

Computers and Technology

1 answer:

tino4ka555 [31]1 year ago

6 0

Answer:

Binary is made up of only 2 digits: a one and a zero. 1011 is eleven in our counting system.

So 10 in binary = 2 in our counting system.

Read the joke as follows. There are 2 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who do not.

I guess it's not really that funny, but computer programmers like it.

You might be interested in

A company is utilizing servers, data storage, data backup, and software development platforms over an Internet connection.

Anarel [89]

Answer:

The answer is A. Cloud computing

Explanation:

Cloud computing is the process of using the internet to store, mange and process data rather than using a local server or a personal computer.

The term cloud computing is generally used to describe data centers available to many users over the Internet.

Therefore the company's approach to computing resources can be said to be cloud computing because it uses the internet for data storage, data backup, and software development

8 0

3 years ago

A man-made world event that would affect the labor market would be a(n) _____.

Digiron [165]

Hurricane and Is there a Choice or..

4 0

4 years ago

Exercise : Randomizer In this exercise, we are going to create a static class Randomizer that will allow users to get random int

Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

Here the code is by using java.

Explanation:

//Randomizer.java

public class Randomizer {

public static int nextInt() {

//get random number from 1-10

int randInteger = (int) (Math.random() * (11) + 1);

//if number is greater than 10 or less than 1

while (randInteger > 10 || randInteger < 1) {

randInteger = (int) (Math.random() * (11) + 1);

}

return randInteger;

}

public static int nextInt(int min, int max) {

//formula to get random number from min-max

int randInteger = (int) (Math.random() * (max + 1) + min);

while (randInteger > max || randInteger < min) {

randInteger = (int) (Math.random() * (max + 1) + min);

}

return randInteger;

}

//RandomizerTester.java

public class RandomizerTester {

public static void main(String[] args) {

System.out.println("Results of Randommizer.nextInt()");

for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

System.out.println(Randomizer.nextInt());

}

int min = 5;

int max = 10;

System.out.println("\n Results of Randomizer.nextInt(5,10)");

for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

System.out.println(Randomizer.nextInt(min, max));

}

OUTPUT:

Results of Randommizer.nextInt()

Results of Randomizer.nextInt(5,10)

4 0

3 years ago

What impact did congress declaration on copyrighting sound recordings have on home recording and record sales

cricket20 [7]

Answer:

By the late 1980s, several manufacturers were prepared to introduce read/write digital audio formats to the United States. These new formats were a significant improvement over the newly introduced read-only (at the time) digital format of the compact disc, allowing consumers to make perfect, multi-generation copies of digital audio recordings. Most prominent among these formats was Digital Audio Tape (DAT), followed in the early 1990s by Philips' Digital Compact Cassette (DCC) and Sony's Minidisc.

DAT was available as early as 1987 in Japan and Europe, but device manufacturers delayed introducing the format to the United States in the face of opposition from the recording industry. The recording industry, fearing that the ability to make perfect, multi-generation copies would spur widespread copyright infringement and lost sales, had two main points of leverage over device makers. First, consumer electronics manufacturers felt they needed the recording industry's cooperation to induce consumers – many of whom were in the process of replacing their cassettes and records with compact discs – to embrace a new music format. Second, device makers feared a lawsuit for contributory copyright infringement.[1]

Despite their strong playing hand, the recording industry failed to convince consumer electronics companies to voluntarily adopt copy restriction technology. The recording industry concurrently sought a legislative solution to the perceived threat posed by perfect multi-generation copies, introducing legislation mandating that device makers incorporate copy protection technology as early as 1987.[2] These efforts were defeated by the consumer electronics industry along with songwriters and music publishers, who rejected any solution that did not compensate copyright owners for lost sales due to home taping.[3]

The impasse was broken at a meeting in Athens in 1989, when representatives from the recording industry and the consumer electronics industry reached a compromise intended to enable the sale of DAT recorders in the United States. Device manufacturers agreed to include SCMS in all consumer DAT recorders in order to prevent serial copying. The recording industry would independently pursue legislation requiring royalties on digital audio recording devices and media.[4]

A year later the songwriter Sammy Cahn and four music publishers, unhappy with the absence of a royalties provision in the Athens agreement, filed a class action copyright infringement suit against Sony.[5] The plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief that would have prevented the manufacture, importation or distribution of DAT recorders or media in the United States. The suit brought Sony to heel. In July 1991, Sony, as part of larger agreement between the recording industry and consumer electronics makers, agreed to support legislation creating a royalty scheme for digital media. In exchange, Cahn and the publishers agreed to drop the suit.[6]

With all the major stakeholders satisfied, the bill easily passed both houses of Congress. President George H. W. Bush signed the AHRA into law in 1992 proclaiming " S. 1623 [AHRA] will ensure that American consumers have access to equipment embodying the new digital audio recording technology. It also protects the legitimate rights of our songwriters, performers, and recording companies to be fairly rewarded for their tremendous talent, expertise, and capital investment. This will be accomplished by fairly compensating these artists for the copying of their works and by creating a system that will prevent unfettered copying of digital audio tapes."

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When replacing a system board in a laptop, which feature is a must?

Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

Having the integrated peripherals in the same locations as the old system board

Explanation:

System board is the printed circuit board that is used to connect the peripheral devices. It provides the slots and ports to connect the peripherals devices.

If there is a need to replace the system board of the laptop. You can change the system board. On new system board, all the peripherals that are installed on previous (old) system board should be placed on new system board. As the system requirements are same, only printed circuit board of the system is changed.

The new system board is replica of the previous board so, we can not change peripheral of the system boards.

5 0

3 years ago