Answer:
The most common myths are:
- C0vid2019 vaccines cause autism
- C0vid2019 vaccines may modify your DNA
- C0vid2019 vaccines are unsafe
Explanation:
The most common myths associated with C0vid2019 vaccines are:
1- C0vid2019 vaccines may cause autism: In 1998, Andrew Wakefield and colleagues published a controversial study in the Lancet where they suggested that the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine may cause autism in some children. However, it has been showed that this study was based on erroneous statements and therefore this publication was retracted.
2- C0vid2019 vaccine may modify your DNA: it has been suggested that vaccines based on viral vectors (e.g. adenoviruses) and mRNA vaccines may modify the DNA of cells. This statement is false because these technologies cannot alter the DNA sequence. These vaccines are based on the production of an mRNA sequence that is translated into a viral protein (spike protein) which triggers an immune response
- C0vid2019 vaccines are unsafe: some people believe that C0vid2019 vaccines are unsafe because they were developed quickly. However, this statement is false because all vaccines (including C0vid2019 vaccines) need to follow rigorous safety standards to be approved by governmental agencies (i.e., they approved all clinical trials).
Answer:
Cercopithecoids have a narrow nose and palate, and smaller brains relative to body size than Hominoids
Steroid estrogens, such as estrone, estradiol, and estriol, are dangerous to soil, plants, water resources, and humans.
<h3>What is "Assault on the Male"?</h3>
This Emmy Award-winning documentary investigates that terrifying possibility. Scientists use sophisticated investigative techniques to track the environmental impact of estrogenic substances.
Small disruptions in the natural order, then the larger consequences: drastically altered ecosystems and disturbance of essential life processes, resulting in decreased male reproduction.
Thus, this way it has shown the effects of environmental estrogens on wildlife and humans.
For more details regarding estrogen, visit:
brainly.com/question/8477222
#SPJ1
Replacing lysine with aspartic acid is really a change in the primary structure (the sequence of the amino acids - think in a chain). But because they are really different amino acids, the effect is much more profound and will affect the tertiary structure of the protein.
Lysine has a basic, positively charged side chain. Aspartic acid has a negatively charged carboxyl group for its side chain. So, they are two very different amino acids.
Since the tertiary structure of a protein is a result of the interactions of the various interactions of the amino acid side chains, you have to think about what a swap of a basic positive amino acid with a negatively charged amino acid could cause.
For example, if the lysine side chain interacted in ionic interactions (i.e. attraction to a negatively charged amino acid), if you swap it for aspartic acid which is negatively charged it will now repel the other amino acid's side chain and that would disrupt the tertiary structure of the protein. It would also likely cause disruption to the quaternary structure as well.
If this change was in an important part of the protein (e.g. the active site of an enzyme) then it would likely disrupt the proper functioning of this protein.
If you wanted to make the least amount of change to a protein by making a mutation to that lysine amino acid, you would choose other basic amino acids which are histidine and arginine.
