Option B. Judicial review
Arizona. “Before questioning, the person should be warned that they have the right to remain silent, that their statements may be used as evidence, and that they have the right to have a commissioned or appointed attorney present.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda's side, and the police officer told the suspect during questioning, "He has the right to remain silent and what he says will be used against him in court." There is a possibility, and he has the right to do so."
In the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that if police do not notify the individual, they will do so with respect to certain individuals arrested in the United States. Their confessions cannot be used as evidence in court, in accordance with constitutional rights, including the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination. .
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona at
brainly.com/question/4429252
#SPJ1
