Answer:
A) $200,000
Explanation:
In this case, Haft has a wide range of possible losses, between $200,000 to $300,000. Since no amount is more probable than others, then the company can decide to report the lowest estimate as long as all the other estimates have the same probability of happening. But if another estimate was probable, e.g. $220,000, then that estimate should be recorded even if it was higher.
Answer:
B) more; decline; rise
Explanation:
If a bank has ________ rate-sensitive assets than liabilities, a ________ in interest rates will reduce bank profits, while a ________ in interest rates will raise bank profits.
A) more; rise; decline
B) more; decline; rise
C) fewer; decline; decline
D) fewer; rise; rise
Answer:
Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Marginal utility refers to the additional utility that a consumer can get from consuming additional units.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as a consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods, then the additional utility drive from each extra unit of the goods goes on diminishing.
The consumption is assumed to be continuous.
Answer:
prenuptial agreement
Explanation:
A prenuptial agreement or prenuo is one that is created between two people before marriage. A prenuo lists all the properties owned by each individual and action to be taken as regards ownership after the marriage.
Prenuptial agreement has been used by parties that are wealthy in marriages to protect their wealth from spouses that may take advantage of them and obtain their wealth after a divorce. For example a person may say his spouse is not entitled to ownership of his property after marriage.
Answer:
substantial business between Barbara and Sarah through Sarah's website.
Explanation:
A person cannot be brought to the court if the person belongs to some other state than the place where case has been filed against him. A court doe not have any jurisdiction over a person if the person is resident of some other state and the court is in some other state.
In the context, Barbara files a case against Sarah in Washington court. But Sarah is not a resident of Washington. Sarah has a website which can be accessed in Washington. Now the court in Washington can have jurisdiction over Sarah only if the claim of Barbara arises any substantial businesses between Barbara and Sarah through the website of Sarah's.