If sufficient dividends are declared, preferred stockholders can anticipate receiving annual dividends of: $0.90 per share.
Using this formula
Annual dividends= Par value × Fixed Annual dividend rate
Where:
Par value= $18 per share
Fixed Annual dividend rate= 5% or 0.05
Let plug in the formula
Annual dividends= $18 per share × 0.05
Annual dividends= $0.90 per share
Inconclusion if sufficient dividends are declared, preferred stockholders can anticipate receiving annual dividends of: $0.90 per share.
Learn more about annual dividend here:brainly.com/question/25557702
Answer:
Company 1 = $2 per share
Company 2 = $2.50 per share
Explanation:
Given that,
EBIT for both companies = $1,000
Number of shares outstanding for company 1 = 500
Number of shares outstanding for company 2 = 300
Interest paid by company 2 = $250
EPS for company 1:
= (Total income - Preferred dividend) ÷ Shares outstanding
= ($1,000 - $0) ÷ 500
= $2 per share
EPS for company 2:
= (Total income - Preferred dividend) ÷ Shares outstanding
= ($1,000 - $250) ÷ 300
= $750 ÷ 300
= $2.50 per share
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Coase theorem states that in a situation of conflicting property right . the trading parties should be able to arrive at a mutually benefiting term that should cover the the cost and other underlying value of the property involved.
In the scenario above , for Billy McGee to retain the domain name as the WIPO has already given the right to Iron maiden , he will have to pay iron maiden more than the value to iron maiden and less than the value to him so that the two can mutually benefit from the transaction
Answer:
The correct answer is B) coercive.
Explanation:
A coercive boss is a rigid and inflexible leader. When this style is used, the leader chooses to give many direct orders without offering his subordinates the opportunity to express their ideas and opinions.
This leader not only does not opt for the reward system but also focuses on criticizing and punishing the failures generated by disobedience. Therefore, the motivation of the team suffers greatly from the inability of employees to perceive that thanks to their work, business objectives are being achieved.
It is usually the least effective management style but ... it may be recommended in crisis situations when it is necessary to show authority and employees need clear and direct orders.
