Answer:
C. To enforce property rights
Explanation:
Government intervention in market can be non materistically via regulation , materistically via taxes & subsidy.
Although the second materislistic way of tax, subsidy comes under the perview of 'Government Budget' .
Government budget is anual financial statement showing economy's expected revenue & expenditure .
Economic growth & stability by reallocation of resources , reducing income inequalities - reflect 'efficiency' & 'equity' as valid reasons .
Foreign protection is also not invalid depending upon the initial budding stage of a developing economy & its global stand. Eg - India 1950 to 1990 .
However all these are progressive legitimate reason for govt. Intervention .
But , enforcing property rights is a feature of 'socialistic (communistic) economy - which has its own demerits like loss of consumers soveireignity , lack of postive competitive efficiency , govt overburden.
Answer:
C. Predictive value.
Explanation:
Relevant information is able to make a difference in user decisions. To do so, it must have predictive value, confirmatory value, or both. Financial information has predictive value if it can be used as an input in a predictive process.
Answer:
The person with Absolute advantage is the one that produces more of a good than the other.
<em><u>Dina </u></em><em>has an absolute advantage in the production of alfalfa, and </em><em><u>Charles</u></em><em> has an absolute advantage in the production of barley. </em>
The person with Comparative Advantage is the person who produces something at a lower opportunity cost.
Charles Opportunity Costs
Producing Alfalfa gives 12 bushels per acre instead of 6 bushels for Barley.
Producing 1 Alfalfa means 6/12 = 0.5 bushels Barley is given up
Producing 1 bushel of Barley means 12/6 = 2 bushels Alfalfa is given up.
Dina Opportunity Costs
Producing Alfalfa gives 15 bushels per acre instead of 5 bushels for Barley.
Producing 1 Alfalfa means 5/15 = 0.33 bushels of Barley is given up
Producing 1 bushel of Barley means 15/5 = 3 bushels of Alfalfa is given up.
<em>Charles's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of barley is </em><em><u>2</u></em><em> bushels of alfalfa, whereas Dina's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of barley is </em><em><u>3</u></em><em> bushels of alfalfa. Because Charles has </em><em><u>lower</u></em><em> a opportunity cost of producing barley than Dina, </em><em><u>Charlie</u></em><em> has a comparative advantage in the production of barley, and </em><em><u>Dina</u></em><em> has a comparative advantage in the production of alfalfa.</em>
Answer:
The U.S. economy is a free enterprise system.
Explanation:
That means that individuals — and not the government — own most of our country's resources.
Answer:
c. $24,500
Explanation:
The allowance for doubtful accounts is a contra-asset account that records the amount of receivables expected to be uncollectiblea, makes a reduction of the total amount of accounts receivable appearing on a company’s balance sheet. There are two way to estimate uncollectible accounts: the percentage of sales method and the accounts receivable aging method.
ABC Company uses the percentage of sales method - application a flat percentage to the total amount of net credit sales for the period.
Estimated uncollectible = 3% x $750,000 = $22,500
The company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts for $22,500 while simultaneously reporting $22,500 in bad debt expense.
Before adjusting on December 31, 2004, the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts had a credit balance of $2,000.
The balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts after adjustment is $22,500 + $2,000 = $24,500
