Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Because naturally within a market the equilibrium price is trying to be reached, (besides price ceilings and floors imposed by the government), Sellers will naturally push the price downwards because they must compete with each other to make a living. Thus answer C. is correct.
Answer:
B. As a risk-averse investor
Explanation:
B. As a risk-averse investor is a correct option . Risk-averse investors can invest in higher risk opportunity only if it offers higher expected return .
<span>Meaning our boundaries
are ever-changing, defined by society, we don’t know what will happen next "so-called
improvements" are only superficial, it's only a distraction, distracts
oneself from the truth. The Society is unwieldy and overgrown, ruined by luxury
and heedless expenses. </span>
Answer:
D) Growth in earnings per share averaging 15% or better annually for the next five years
Explanation:
First of all, objectives must be well defined and measurable. That is why increasing profitability is a good idea but not a very good strategic objective, since a 0.00001% growth in profits will still comply with it. The same applies with growing market share.
Improving product quality will help improve total sales but it is not a financial objective.
The only financial objective that is precise and measurable is option D, which sets the goal of increasing earnings per share at least 15% every year.