1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
monitta
1 year ago
7

Mia hawk works as a secretary at buildco. , a large construction company that specializes in government contracts. Mia is in cha

rge of reviewing the invoices that buildco. Sends to the state of vermont, regarding the construction of a new facility for the state’s department of transportation. Mia discovers that buildco managers have been illegally overcharging the costs of time and materials in their invoices to state officials. Mia tells irene, a co-worker, about the overcharges during a lunch break and suggests that they should be fixed. Two weeks later, mia is abruptly fired by her immediate supervisor. Assuming that her termination was because of her disclosures to irene, did buildco. Legally terminate mia?.
Law
1 answer:
Harlamova29_29 [7]1 year ago
7 0

Yes, Buildco. Legally remove mia because Mia did not report activity to the essential individuals or entities.

<h3>Whistleblower</h3>

A whistleblower is an individual, often an employee, who reveals data about activity within a private/public organization that is deemed illegal, corrupt, illicit, unsafe, or fraudulent. Whistleblowers can use a combination of internal or external channels to share information or allegations.

<h3>What is a whistleblower at work?</h3>

A whistleblower is someone who declares workplace conditions that he or she believes to be unsafe or illegal. You can't avenge a whistleblower for documenting injuries, safety concerns, or other protected activities.

To learn more about whistleblowers visit the link

brainly.com/question/10649836

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
The fate of privatized prisons cannot yet be determined.<br><br> True<br> False
elena-s [515]
I think it’s false but I’m not sure..
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
So if someone went from Alabama to Texas to pick up a family member and take them back to Alabama would it be legal
VLD [36.1K]
Yes because they never left the country and they are a citizen
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tools
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

4 0
3 years ago
Voting laws are controlled by the us constitution and...
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Government

Explanation:

mark if this help

4 0
3 years ago
6. Describe one thing you think your representative should do.
alexdok [17]

Answer:

Also referred to as a congressman or congresswoman, each representative is elected to a two-year term serving the people of a specific congressional district. Among other duties, representatives introduce bills and resolutions, offer amendments and serve on committees.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • this term refers to the laws that protect citizens from undue or unwarranted government intrusion into their lives, either perso
    11·2 answers
  • Ok I'm not a perv (not to be nasty) I a guy doe things with a girl and she smiles and make a noice is that r*pes?? Yes o no
    12·2 answers
  • Which group would most likely investigate a person accused of election fraud in North Carolina?
    5·2 answers
  • Oscar owns a bulldog. Another dog owner filed a lawsuit against Oscar alleging that his bulldog injured her pet poodle in a dog
    14·1 answer
  • When driving during the daytime in reduced visibility, such as rain, smoke, or fog,
    5·2 answers
  • In 1999, Congress approved legislation establishing a system to identify states in the West that might provide nuclear storage s
    12·1 answer
  • Researchers who ascribe to the belief that there are multiple realities to be discovered are known as
    9·1 answer
  • What are the problems to live in a group according to law?<br>​
    13·1 answer
  • 1. what is public opinion ?
    14·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST + 18 FOR CORRECT ANSWER
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!