Most crimes are those of C. omission meaning one must make a truly voluntary act to be found guilty.
<h3>What is a Crime?</h3>
This refers to the act or action of engaging in an activity that is prohibited and is outlawed by the laws of a place.
Hence, we can see that based on the fact that most crimes are crimes of omission, which means that because a person failed to perform his legal duty, then one must make a truly voluntary act to be found guilty.
Read more about crimes of omission here:
brainly.com/question/27230467
Group of answer choices.
A. being replaced by videographers.
B. being replaced by crime-scene reconstruction animation.
C. being replaced by security and surveillance cameras.
D. responsible to provide only crucial photographs of the crime scene.
Answer:
A. being replaced by videographers.
Explanation:
Forensic investigation can be defined as a field in criminology that deals with the gathering and analysis of all physical evidences related with a crime, so as to determine the facts and reach a conclusion on the victim and suspect. There are various techniques and software applications or programs used for obtaining and gathering data (informations) about a crime such as ProDiscover Forensic, CAINE, iLook, Sleuth Kit, identiKIT, etc.
In Forensics, the two-dimensional crime-scene images produced by still-life photography are now being replaced by videographers using modern technologies and techniques.
Videographer refers to an individual who is a professional or expert in the production of video-based clips through the use of a video camera. With this technology, forensic investigator are able to gather and analyze crime-scene footages using three-dimensional images or clips obtained from videographers.
The concept of enforcement districts or precincts was contributed by whom?
Ans: Romans
Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.
A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.
Learn more about Proximate cause, here
brainly.com/question/13885854
#SPJ4
