Answer:
1. 101,268
2. one-hundred one thousand, two hundred sixty eight
3. 6
4.2
5.1
6. I'm not sure how I would show u that on here
7. nearest 10: 101,270 nearest 100: 101,300 nearest 1000:101,300
Explanation:
<span>Scholaticism merges theology- specifically Christian theology- with Aristotelian logic. Theological truth guides Aristotelian inquiry in this particular methodology. One notable example is Thomas Aquinas. Yet the same can be said for the muslims, such as Averroes and Avicenna, who around the same general time, sought to apply Aristotelian logic within their own theological systems.</span>
The best answer here is choice B. We can determine this because of the tense used throughout the passage itself. Bearing this in mind, choice B matches the tense perfectly.
Choice A does not work at all because the verb "am" makes no sense in the context of the sentence. The same is true for choice C. The passage is not in present tense, so it cannot be this choice. Choice D could make sense, except that this is in the future tense versus the past tense.
Shakespeare's Juliet is a mixture of caution and passion. In Act I, Scene 5, when she first meets Romeo, who is all passion, she urges him to act naturally, not poetically, and she asks him to swear by the "inconstant moon" in Act II, Scene 2. Now, in this scene Juliet finds herself experiencing conflicting emotions. Certainly, she is troubled that Romeo is the son of her father's mortal enemy; for, as she dreamily contemplates the evening's events, Juliet soliloquizes
“...Romeo doff thy name
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself”
