All categories

3 years ago

Men and women are most likely to differ in their levels of A) happiness. B) intelligence. C) creativity D) violent crime.

Social Studies

2 answers:

Oliga [24]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

D) violent crime.

Explanation:

On average, women across the world only comitt around 14% of the total violent crimes while the rest was being done by the men counterpart.

Studies shows that this number is influenced by the difference in hormones in our body. Since men has higher number of testosterone, men become more likely to indluge in agressive behaviors. During conflicts, such agresssive beheavior are the one that is most likely lead to violent crimes.

Oxana [17]3 years ago

6 0

<em>D) violent crime</em>

Further explanation

crime is not merely physical. Non-physical crimes also occur everywhere. there are many causes for someone to commit a crime even to the detriment of others.

basically crime is an act that can sacrifice others and oppose applicable laws.

One form of crime that occurs in the midst of people's lives is violence. This violence feels its frequency in the social environment. The so-called violence is an act of harming others.

the large number of population and social problems in the environment cannot be separated from the actions of men even though the number is not proportional to the birth rate of women.

the population in Indonesia is still dominated by women. however, the violence that appears in the community is mostly men or causes of violence.

This happens due to uncontrolled life of school-age children by parents and the environment.

The process of preventing violence in Indonesia is still very slow, still very ordinary, still considered a non-serious problem. At least the process of handling a good legal action is to improve or provide facilities for the progress of the post-legal response progress.

Destroy the stigma that men are synonymous with violence.

Learn More

violence crime : brainly.com/question/12530513

Details

Class : high school

Subject : social studies

Keywords : crime, population, violence, factor

You might be interested in

Mrs. Weston asks her 8-year-old son, Colin, if he wants his sandwich in one piece, or cut into two pieces. Colin asks her to kee

Nikitich [7]

Question Options:

A. does not understand reversibility

B. does not yet understand conversation

C. has mastered the concept of egocentrism

D. has not yet achieved object permanence.

Answer:In the context of Piaget's theory of cognitive development, Colin's answer suggests that he does not yet understand conversation

Explanation: In this question, what Colin was asked is different from the answer he provided. He was asked if he wanted his sandwich in one piece, or cut into two pieces but he replied that it be kept it in one piece, because he isn't hungry enough to eat two pieces. What this indicates is that he does not yet understand conversation which is what Piaget explained in his theory of cognitive development in the Concrete operational stage this is the stage where the child learns to reason with logic.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Voting age in india is

Galina-37 [17]

The voting age in India is 18

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose you are a first-year teacher and your administrator has asked to meet with you to discuss your first evaluative

-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

PowerPoint presentation

Explanation:

The reason why I choose PowerPoint presentation is because she will get to see my point of view from a better angle

8 0

3 years ago

Four-year-old Jenna is looking at a drawing of her family tree. Her father tells her she has three aunts and two grandmothers. H

Ne4ueva [31]

Answer: She will most likely say she has more grandmothers.

Explanation: The four year old is more likely to say more grandmothers because a four year old might not or is incapable of some form of logical reasoning. By the age of 7 to 8, a child should be then capable of identifying the difference and similarities between grandmothers, aunts and relatives.

7 0

3 years ago

Was slavery the main cause of the civil war? explain why you agree or disagree

sasho [114]

I think the cotton invention was the main cause of the civil war. From the cotton invention they had used people of color as sales began to boost up more people rebelled against this. (my own opinion)

<u>In other words,</u>

I agree that slavery was the main cause of the civil war because farmers had used slaves as a cheap and efficient way to do cotton work without losing that much money. Slaves were usually sold for around 800 dollars which made things way much better for farmers. If farmers were to hire men, they would have to pay them monthly which would have a heavier cost. Think about it like this: Buy a phone for 300 dollars, or rent a phone for 30 dollars a month. In the end, buying a phone (one time payment) would be cheaper. Farmers didn't want to resort to hiring men as this would cost much. Therefore, a civil war had broken out.

3 0

3 years ago