The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include the lesson notes or the link to them, to know what you are talking about. Neither the articles of the authors Arquilla and Weimann.
However, trying to help, we did some research and can comment on the following.
It is true that enhanced communication has allowed for the growth of "networks" of organizations. The pro of these new networks is that it allows people who have similar thoughts or opinions, to have a formal channel of communication to express their points of views and fight for their causes.
The con of these new actors on the international stage is that not all have the best intentions in mind. Some of them can use the new networks for negative purposes as in the case of terrorist groups. For instance, John Arquilla affirms that most of these groups are formed to protest against the policies of governments or are anti-status quo.
Some of these groups promote an environmental agenda, civil rights, support any particular ideology or country in disgrace, or simply critique the performance of a public official or government.
Is this to help people feel better and be happy?
Answer:
Hard.
Explanation:
The life for a young apprentice in colonial days was hard because he works with his master to learn trade. I also want to be an apprentice because this job gives me a lot of knowledge for the trade and I gain this knowledge from my master and this job helps me to better my economic condition and support my family so that's why I want to be an apprentice.
Answer:
With the expansion of the Industrial Revolution in the U.K, they soon found out that they needed more raw materials to not only invent but also create their products. The Colonial Empire was located around the world, and was able to produce much of the needed natural material due to their suitable climates for different materials. These materials helped with the building of Great Britain, not only economically, but also militarily.
~
The Chinese people held low level jobs with little power
