David, sarah's supervisor at work, invites her to dinner. politely, sarah tells david that she would rather not. david persists
and asks her again, this time indicating that he finds her very "foxy." david implies that sarah could be promoted if she agrees to date him. sarah tells david that she does not want to go out with him. david persists, asking sarah several more times a day to go out with him. he implies that, continuing to say "no," she may lose out on a promotion. according to federal statutes and the equal employment opportunity commission, sarah appears to be the victim of
<span>The answer is "quid pro quo harassment".</span>
Quid pro quo harassment happens in the working environment when an
administrator or other expert figure offers or just indications that he or she
will give the representative something for example a raise or an advancement,
as a byproduct of that worker's fulfillment of a sexual request. The term comes
from Latin which means “What for what or Something for something”.
