Answer:
A Faithless elector is a member of the United States Electoral College who, for whatever reason, does not vote for the presidential or vice presidential candidate for whom he or she had pledged to vote. They break faith with the candidate they were pledged to and vote for another candidate, or fail to vote.
Explanation:
The answer is A, the first 10 amendments.
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
Answer:
The evidence that a researcher decides to use should be from a credible source and should be track-able.
It can or cannot back the hypothesis created by the researcher. In both cases, the researcher must synthesis it properly into his research. It must build a connection and somewhat extends the points discussed in the hypothesis.
Either way it should have a direction. Something that does not connect to the core of research must not be added in it.
<span>There are a lot of voluntary actions that citizens can take to make a political difference beyond voting. They can donate time and/or money. They can attend rallies and marches. They can write articles and social media posts. There are so many other ways to help!</span>
