<u>Answer:
</u>
In most cases, a U.S. researcher affiliated with an academic institution, proposing to conducted funded research outside of the U.S., must have the approval of an IRB from both the researcher's U.S. institution and an equivalent entity within the host country.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- It is mandatory for a researcher from the United States willing to conduct research within or outside the domestic boundary of the United States to have the approval of the Institutional Review Board of the institution that he is working with.
- If the researcher is willing to conduct research specifically outside the domestic boundaries of the US, he is required to form a collaboration with an institute functioning in the country of research and get an approval from the Institutional Review Board of that particular institute along with the approval of the IRB of his native academic institute.
No matter your reasons for breaking a law, there are always going to be consequences when you're caught. Whether you think doing so is the right thing or not.
Answer:
Three
Explanation: They are the highest class, basically the top 1%
The answer is: Civil Rights Act of 1964
Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act was created to prohibit discrimination toward people who have disabilities in terms of receiving federal assistance or treatment in the work place.
Section 504 of the 1973 rehabilitation act was inspired by Civil Rights Act of 1964. But, Civil right Act of 1964 only protect discrimination based on race, religion, skin color, sex or national origin. Civil right act of 1964 did not mentioned disabled people. So, Section 504 of the 1973 rehabilitation act borrowed the language directly and applied it to the disabled.
they never mention talk of criminal population and it was families who went to the "New land"
they accidentally discovered "North America" so why would they want people to settle into Europe
they never cared about the natives
bing bing the right one, they wanted more for them
