Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
3.6 + 3.6 is not 9 & 2.84 + 2.84 is not 7.1
Answer:
The y-intercept of the function represented in the graph will be: (0, 2)
The graph is also attached.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the function
the y-intercept of the function can be determined by setting x=0 and solving for y.
so
Thus, the y-intercept of the function represented in the graph will be: (0, 2)
The graph is also attached.
Answer:
72 percent of the total houses are small
Step-by-step explanation:
The first step is to know the total apartments from the ratio: This is got by adding 18 + 7 = 25
The ratio of small apartments to regular ones is 18:7
To get the percentage that is small, we have to express the number of small houses when compared to the total available apartments. (<em>Note: not the regular ones) </em>as a percentage.
This will be (18/25) X 100 = 72%
Therefore, 72 percent of the total houses are small
I don’t know to be honest
Interesting question
Usually when you look at something like that construction, you think that AB has been bisected by PQ and that the two segments are perpendicular. They are perpendicular but nowhere is that stated. So the answer is C because all the other answers are wrong.
PQ is congruent AB is not correct. As long as the arcs are equal and meet above and below AB there is no proof of congruency. In your mind widen the compass legs so that they are wider than AB and redraw the arcs. You get a larger PQ, but it has all the original properties of PQ except size.
PQ is not congruent to AQ. How would you prove conguency? You'd have to put both lines into triangles that can be proved congruent. It can't be done.
The two lines are not parallel. They are perpendicular. That can be proven. They meet at right angles to each other (also provable).
