<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
<u>The retained earning statement for the company Crane for the year 2017 is as follows:
</u>
Martinez Company
Retained Earnings Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
Retained Earnings, January 1 $2,190,000
Less: Correction of Depreciation Error $382000
Retained Earnings, January 1, as adjusted $1,808000
Add: Net Income $929000
Less: Dividends $226000
Retained Earnings, December 31 $2,511000
Retained earnings at the starting year is to be considered and depreciation and dividend amount is to be deducted whereas the net income is to be added.
Answer:
the gross pay of Lloyd is $6,250
Explanation:
The computation of the gross pay is shown below:
= Amount received annually ÷ number of months
= $150,000 ÷ 24
= $6,250
Hence, the gross pay of Lloyd is $6,250
we simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
The other things would be irrelavant
Answer:
Increase
Explanation:
The elimination of minimum wage, means that the wage or "price" for teenage workers will decrease.
Next we can use the information that both type of workers are complements. Remembering that two goods are complements if the cross price elasticity is negative. This means that if the price of one good decreases the demand for the other will increase.
Since the price for teenage workers decreased by the elimination of minimum wage that will make the demand for adult workers to increase.
Answer:
Statements Arguments
A The Infant-Industry Argument
B The Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip Argument
C The Jobs Argument
D The Unfair-Competition Argument
Explanation:
The Jobs Argument: Domestic jobs need to be protected for the good of the national economy, according to this argument.
The National-Security Argument: Some products and services are, by their nature, issues reserved under national security. To expose the internal security systems of a nation may have untold consequences.
The Infant-Industry Argument: Nascent industries require domestic protection from foreign competitors if they must grow to competitive levels.
The Unfair-Competition Argument: This is more pronounced in developing countries without the manufacturing facilities to compete fairly with developed economies.
The Protection-as-a Bargaining-Chip Argument is argues that trade restrictions may be imposed to force other countries to reverse or remove trade restrictions.
