D. all of the above
hope this helped:)
Stone criticizes the agency argument
because of the following reasons:
1.The law does not hold that directors
are mere agents of the shareholders
2. In the real world, the shareholders
do not select the directors
3. Why should the directors have more moral accountability
to the shareholders than to other people
Answer:
The correct answer is A. One of the benefits of the current pattern of global trade is that consumers pay lower prices for goods and services.
Explanation:
Today, globalization has expanded international markets, interconnecting nations and their economies through free trade agreements, tariff elimination agreements and even through the transfer of companies from developed countries to peripheral countries, generating work in these nations and lowering production costs that allow reducing prices. All this allows consumers to access goods and services at a much lower cost than they previously accessed, thus reducing the amount they dedicate to consumption and thus increasing the performance of their wages, even allowing poverty reduction and a greater quality of life for people.
Answer:
savings is $97107.29
Explanation:
given data
college costs increase = 4% per year
invested paying r = 7%
available age g = 18
solution
we consider here Current Fees per year = $12500
we get here future value for 18 year that is
future value = 12500 × 
...............1
future value FV = $25322.71
and
present value of growing annuity find the four years college fee
so here
Total Money = 
................2
so put here value
Total Money = 
Total Money = 97107.288177
so that savings is $97107.29
Answer:
Promissory estoppel
Explanation:
Promissory estoppel means that in legal tenet that a promise or pledge can be enforced by law, actually if formulated without legal consideration, if the George now the (promisor) has made a pledge to a Susy the (promises) who then depends on that promise for a subsequent detriment. So what Promissory estoppel is expected to do is to stop the (George) promisor from insisting that an underlying promise should not be legally authorized or implemented. So Susy can sue George on the basis of promissory estoppel and get a reward for George's disappointment
