Historians can learn a lot about Babylonia from Hammurabi's Code.According to the Code, Babylonian religion was Polythestic and Monothestic because some groups believed in more than one god while others mainly believed on one god According to the Code, theBabylonian economy was based on Putting work on the field.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, your question is incomplete. You did not include the text. Without the text, we do not have the information to answer your question. Yo did not include a link to the text, or the name of the author. So we do not know what is included in "Part A."
However, trying to help you, we can assume you are talking about the famous essay "Civil Disobedience," written by Henry David Thoreau, in 1849.
As we do not know what is the excerpt and knowing that the essay is too long, we are going to comment on the following general terms.
It is probably that the two ideas that you are looking at in the essay are:
"Individuals have a responsibility to disobey laws that are inherently unjust and in conflict with their morals," and "Citizens must challenge and attempt to change the wrongs of the state; it is not enough to work within the system."
The sentences that serve as evidence are <em>“…but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law,”</em> and <em>“Let your life be a counter-friction to stop the machine… As for adopting the ways which the State has provided for remedying the evil, I know not of such ways.”</em>
Thoreau was a rebel of his time. He heavily opposed the institution of slavery and he also expressed his opposition to the Mexican-American War. That is why he wrote his essay "Civil Disobediencei" in 1849, inviting the American people to reflect on his behavior and conduct against unjust laws and the wrongdoings of politicians.
<em />
Answer:
Federalism is a kind of government where the force is split between the public government and other administrative units. It stands out from a unitary government, where a focal position holds the force, and a confederation, wherein states, for instance, are unmistakably prevailing.
Explanation:
Answer:
What do u mean by this
What type of help do you need
Similarities:
Both empires emerged in the 14th and 15th centuries as postclassic civilizations building on the innovations of earlier political powers but expanding to greater extents
Both empires were entirely infantry, but well supplied, well-organized, and extremely aggressive and militaristic. Javelins, slings, spears and maces were used in battle.
Both empires had inherent instabilities
Both empires were fueled by corn.
Both empires have little to no seafaring, and instead stuck to the mountains and valleys in the center of the region.
Both empires conquered hundreds of cities in the region that resented their rule and taxation
Both empires were ended by Spanish invasions that capitalized on native divisions, introduced disease, and Spanish technology of guns, horses, and steel.
Both empires are misnamed-the Inka was the ruler of Tawantinsuyu, and the Aztecs adopted the name Mexica.
Both empires provided public education
Both Atahualpa and Moctezuma decided against confronting the Spanish militarily, allowing for the Spanish to take the Emperors hostage.
Attempts to restore the monarchy came after the capture and death of the emperor, but were too late.
Differences:
The Incas were bronze age, Aztecs were stone age
THe Incas assigned governors and shuffled conquered peoples around. There was a greater centralization than in Mexico
The Aztecs were a tributary empire, not a direct one.
The Aztecs had writing, while the Incas used Quipu
The Aztecs still had many rivals left unsubdued
The Inca used mostly potatoes while corn was far more dominant in Mexico.
The Inca had llamas, small but important livestock that made transport easier
The Inca had a sophisticated courier system of Chasquis along state-maintained roads
The Inca used bronze axes and halberds, with slings and maces as their main weapons alongside spears. The Aztecs used obsidian swords and glaives instead for close combat, and used javelins far more. Likewise, while Inca military relied on the unit’s experience and officer corps for their quality like the Romans, the Aztecs instead had a feudalistic division between the elite knights and commoners, with advancement by taking captives.
The Inca allowed women into their schools but not commoners. The Aztecs prohibited women but allowed for peasant men to also gain an education.
The diseases that destroyed the Incas came before the Spanish actually arrived in Peru, while the Spanish had been in Mexico for months before the plagues killed the emperor and populace.
Moctezuma’s mistake was trying to use generosity to awe the Spanish and try to coax them on his side, while Atahualpa’s was trying to awe them with his army rather than actually using it.
The Inca political crisis was a civil war between two brothers, while the Aztec’s was a three way duel between the King, the Priests, and the Aristocracy and military.
