Answer:
Cash flow from assets = $51,800
Explanation:
Cash flow from assets = Cash flow to Creditors + Cash flow to Shareholders
Cash flow to creditors = Interest Paid – (New loans taken – Paid Loans)
= $28,311 - ($0 - $21,000)
= $28,311 + $21,000
= $49,311
Cash flow to shareholders = Dividends paid – Net new equity
= $27,500 – $25,000
= $2,500
Cash flow from assets = $49,311 + $2,500 = $51,811
Answer:
Matrix organization structure
Explanation:
A matrix organizational structure is a work arrangement in which employees report to two or more supervisors rather than one line manager overseeing every project aspect. The reporting relationships are grid-like, with employees reporting to both product and functional managers. For example, an employee may have a direct manager they report to, plus one or more project managers they operate under.
The matrix organizational structure is useful when sharing skills across departments is necessary to complete a project.
1,D u answered it 2,B 3,A 4,E 5,C
Answer:
D. Financial measures are lead indicators of future success.
Explanation:
This is said to be not true regarding financial and non financial measures of performance.
Businesswise, it is often debated whether a commonly perceived good company, as defined by characteristics such as competitive advantage, stable earnings, above-average management, and market leadership, is also a good company in which to invest. While these characteristics of a good company can point toward a good investment, this article will explain how to also evaluate the company's financial characteristics and how to know if a company is a good investment.
Answer:
D. Qualified for the Position
Explanation:
Prima Facie Evidence
Prima Facie evidence is evidence that is sufficient to establish a fact or prove a proposition unless otherwise refutted.
Age Discriminationi in Employment Act
The age discrimination in Employment Act in the US was established as a labour law in 1967 and it was established to ensure that anyone who is at least 40 years of age does not suffer from employment discrimination.
The fact that Sharon is a forty-five year-old employee means she is qualified to file a suit against her employers under the Act. However, as previously stated before it can be established whether she deserves a higher pay or more dependable than her replacement or was discriminated against because of age, Sharon will need to establish the fact that she's qualified for the position taken away from her.
If she cannot prove that proposition or it ends up being refutted by the organisation, then the Age Discrimination in Employment Act cannot be invoked.
