Answer:
The answer is d. Centralized purchasing is where individual, local purchasing departments, such as at the plant level, make their own purchasing decisions.
Explanation:
Centralized purchasing is a purchasing system in which all the departments of a company with a wide geographical distribution can make purchases through a common purchasing organization.
Answer:
Luney Corporation is authorized to sell 100000 shares
luney has issued = 70000 shares
luney has shares outstanding 63000
Explanation:
given data
maximum shares of common stock = 100,000
sold shares = 70,000
reacquired = 7,000
solution
we know here 100000 shares are mention in charter of the company
so Luney Corporation is authorized to sell 100000 shares
and luney has issued = 70000 shares
so here
we know that
luney has shares outstanding = 70000 - 7000
luney has shares outstanding 63000
Answer:
are $270 billion
Explanation:
Change in business inventories in 2012 = -$70 billion
GDP of 2012 = $200 billion
Final sales in 2012 = GDP - Change in inventory
Final sales in 2012 = $200 billion - (- 70 billion )
Final sales in 2012 = $200 Billion + 70 billion
Final sales in 2012 = $270 billion
Hence proved that the correct answer is $270 billion
Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
- Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
- Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.
Dude, you've got your priorities all sorted out ahahah
