Answer:
jjjokiioololll.hgyuhhkopohjo
Answer:
<u>greater than what it was before</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Remember</em>, a tornado usually causes significant structural damages to houses within its area of impact., and this requires running expenses to repair the damage.
Hence,<u> since the term </u><u>expenditure, </u><u>also implies expenses; we can expect the total expenditure on housing after the tornado to be </u><u>greater than</u><u> what it was before the tornado since families would be paying for repairs.</u>
Need a picture! Then I will be happy to help :
The relationship for this function is linear love
Answer:
The first option im pretty sure
Step-by-step explanation: