Answer:
law of effect
Explanation:
Thorndike referred to this as the law of effect. In simple terms, Thorndike explains that if a certain stimulus/behavior has a favorable consequence, the subject will want to repeat this behavior. If it continues to have a favorable consequence then the subject will continue to repeat this behavior until it becomes a continuous pattern. The opposite applies to behaviors that have unfavorable consequences, the subject in question will associate the unfavorable consequence with the behavior and cease performing the behavior. The worse the consequence, the faster the subject will stop the behavior.
Organisms (belonging to the same species) may adapt in different ways to better exploit different environments or resources-- survival of the fittest. They also may evolve varied characteristics for attracting mates for reproduction. This means that different groups evolve differently. Over time, these groups or populations may become so different that they can no longer breed together -- and separate species are formed.
I believe the answer is: Integrative theory
Integrative theory view that society could never be exist unless each individuals fulfill their own roles. These happen because humans are unique in terms of our talent/capabilities. So in order to crate a well functioning society, different humans had to integrate our different capability to operate it.
Supply is inelastic and demand is elastic for land.
Answer:
a) usually relates to less compromise in one's partner than gentler kinds of power.
Explanation:
Coercive power involves the show of threats of punishments to people to enable obey certain instructions.
This form of power usually relates to less compromise in one's partner than gentler kinds of power. This is because of the fear of being punished in several ways as a result of things not being followed. In gentler kinds of Power, there are no much risks of punishments which results to compromise in a partner being more likely.
