I support Andrew Jackson's claim which states that the Indian Removal was done in the best interests of American Indians.
The indian removal of the United States to Individual States brough several benefits, such as:
- It put an end to a possible <u>danger of collision.</u>
- It <u>allowed states to grow</u> rapidly in wealth, power and population, which reinforced the southwestern border.
In addition, the indian removal to the native americans contributed to:
- <u>Release the Indians</u> of the power of the state.
- Enabled them to <u>maintain their way of life</u> (culture, traditions, language, etc).
As Jackson quoted himself "The removal was necessary because the <u>Native Americans would be annihilated</u>".
What website do they give youu so i can i write it .. or I can use anything ?
The Stamp Act Congress<span> or </span>First Congress of the American Colonies<span> was a meeting held between October 7 and 25, 1765 in </span>New York City<span>, consisting of representatives from some of the </span>British colonies in North America<span>; it was the first gathering of elected representatives from several of the American colonies to devise a unified protest against new British taxation.</span>
1. Alexander Stephens
2. Border States
3. West Virginia
4. Fort Sumter
5. Jefferson Davis
6. Robert Anderson
7. South Carolina
8. Crittenden Compromise