The answer would be:
-2(x+1)
Answer:
I am sorry
Step-by-step explanation:
The missing reason to complete Hector's proof is
<span>Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles Are Congruent
It's been established in the previous statement that triangle LNO and triangle PNM are congruent by the AAS Postulate.
The proof
</span>Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles Are Congruent
is comprehensive.
Answer:
where is the question? please attatch the angle
