First statement is correct. If Sasha reads her novel for 94 minutes, she meets the minimum reading requirement without reading any of the autobiography.
Given,
The rate of reading of a novel by Sasha = 0.8 pages per minute
The rate of reading of autobiography by Sasha = 0.5 pages per minute
The reading requirement of Sasha's English class = atleast 75 pages per week
The given equation: 0.8n + 0.5a ≥ 75
n is the number of minutes she reads the novel
a is the number of minutes she reads the autobiography
Now, let's check the statements:
Statement 1: If Sasha reads her novel for 94 minutes, she meets the minimum reading requirement without reading any of the autobiography.
That is,
0.8 × 94 + 0.5 × 0 ≥ 75
75.2 ≥ 75
This statement satisfies the equation.
Other 4 statement didn't satisfy the equation.
So, first statement is correct.
Learn more about rate of reading here:
brainly.com/question/4459849
#SPJ1
D a rhombus because it dosnt always have congruent sides
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.
Answer:
14
Step-by-step explanation:
